[PATCH v2 03/24] arm/cpu: Make sure arch_cpu_idle_dead() doesn't return
Josh Poimboeuf
jpoimboe at kernel.org
Wed Feb 15 05:39:26 AEDT 2023
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:15:23AM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 11:05:37PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > arch_cpu_idle_dead() doesn't return. Make that more explicit with a
> > BUG().
> >
> > BUG() is preferable to unreachable() because BUG() is a more explicit
> > failure mode and avoids undefined behavior like falling off the edge of
> > the function into whatever code happens to be next.
>
> This is silly. Just mark the function __noreturn and be done with it.
> If the CPU ever executes code past the "b" instruction, it's already
> really broken that the extra instructions that BUG() gives will be
> meaningless.
>
> This patch does nothing except add yet more bloat the kernel.
>
> Sorry, but NAK.
Problem is, the compiler can't read inline asm. So you'd get a
"'noreturn' function does return" warning.
We can do an unreachable() instead of a BUG() here if you prefer
undefined behavior.
--
Josh
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list