[PATCH] tests/bpf: Fix the bpf test to check for libtraceevent support
Athira Rajeev
atrajeev at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Feb 1 00:50:01 AEDT 2023
"bpf" tests fails in environment with missing libtraceevent
support as below:
# ./perf test 36
36: BPF filter :
36.1: Basic BPF filtering : FAILED!
36.2: BPF pinning : FAILED!
36.3: BPF prologue generation : FAILED!
The environment has clang but missing the libtraceevent
devel. Hence perf is compiled without libtraceevent support.
Detailed logs:
./perf test -v "Basic BPF filtering"
Failed to add BPF event syscalls:sys_enter_epoll_pwait
bpf: tracepoint call back failed, stop iterate
Failed to add events selected by BPF
The bpf tests tris to add probe event which fails
at "parse_events_add_tracepoint" function due to missing
libtraceevent. Add check for "HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT" in the
"tests/bpf.c" before proceeding with the test.
With the change,
# ./perf test 36
36: BPF filter :
36.1: Basic BPF filtering : Skip (not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support)
36.2: BPF pinning : Skip (not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support)
36.3: BPF prologue generation : Skip (not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support)
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
tools/perf/tests/bpf.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
index 17c023823713..4af39528f611 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
#define NR_ITERS 111
#define PERF_TEST_BPF_PATH "/sys/fs/bpf/perf_test"
-#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
+#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT)
#include <linux/bpf.h>
#include <bpf/bpf.h>
@@ -330,10 +330,10 @@ static int test__bpf(int i)
static int test__basic_bpf_test(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
int subtest __maybe_unused)
{
-#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
+#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT)
return test__bpf(0);
#else
- pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF support is not compiled\n");
+ pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF or libtraceevent support is not compiled\n");
return TEST_SKIP;
#endif
}
@@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ static int test__basic_bpf_test(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
static int test__bpf_pinning(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
int subtest __maybe_unused)
{
-#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
+#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT)
return test__bpf(1);
#else
- pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF support is not compiled\n");
+ pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF or libtraceevent support is not compiled\n");
return TEST_SKIP;
#endif
}
@@ -352,17 +352,17 @@ static int test__bpf_pinning(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
static int test__bpf_prologue_test(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
int subtest __maybe_unused)
{
-#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE)
+#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE) && defined(HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT)
return test__bpf(2);
#else
- pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF support is not compiled\n");
+ pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF or libtraceevent support is not compiled\n");
return TEST_SKIP;
#endif
}
static struct test_case bpf_tests[] = {
-#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
+#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT)
TEST_CASE("Basic BPF filtering", basic_bpf_test),
TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF pinning", bpf_pinning,
"clang isn't installed or environment missing BPF support"),
@@ -373,9 +373,9 @@ static struct test_case bpf_tests[] = {
TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF prologue generation", bpf_prologue_test, "not compiled in"),
#endif
#else
- TEST_CASE_REASON("Basic BPF filtering", basic_bpf_test, "not compiled in"),
- TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF pinning", bpf_pinning, "not compiled in"),
- TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF prologue generation", bpf_prologue_test, "not compiled in"),
+ TEST_CASE_REASON("Basic BPF filtering", basic_bpf_test, "not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support"),
+ TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF pinning", bpf_pinning, "not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support"),
+ TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF prologue generation", bpf_prologue_test, "not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support"),
#endif
{ .name = NULL, }
};
--
2.39.0
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list