[PATCH v2 00/10] Don't let i2c adapters declare I2C_CLASS_SPD support if they support I2C_CLASS_HWMON
Heiner Kallweit
hkallweit1 at gmail.com
Sun Dec 17 07:23:47 AEDT 2023
On 24.11.2023 11:16, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> After removal of the legacy eeprom driver the only remaining I2C
> client device driver supporting I2C_CLASS_SPD is jc42. Because this
> driver also supports I2C_CLASS_HWMON, adapters don't have to
> declare support for I2C_CLASS_SPD if they support I2C_CLASS_HWMON.
> It's one step towards getting rid of I2C_CLASS_SPD mid-term.
>
> Series was created supported by Coccinelle and its splitpatch.
>
> v2:
> - fix style issue in patch 4
> - add ack in patch 2
> - set proper subject prefix for all patches
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1 at gmail.com>
>
> ---
>
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ali1535.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ali1563.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ali15x3.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-amd756.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-amd8111.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-elektor.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-gpio.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ibm_iic.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-iop3xx.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-isch.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-kempld.c | 3 +--
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxcpld.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nforce2.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pasemi-pci.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-scmi.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sh7760.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sibyte.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sis5595.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sis630.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sis96x.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-via.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-viapro.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/scx200_acb.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/i2c-stub.c | 2 +-
> drivers/media/pci/netup_unidvb/netup_unidvb_i2c.c | 2 +-
> drivers/staging/greybus/i2c.c | 2 +-
> 27 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
This series and my other series are sitting idle in patchwork
for 3 weeks now. AFAICS they have the needed ack's.
Anything missing before they can be applied?
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list