[PATCH 16/17] powerpc/qspinlock: allow indefinite spinning on a preempted owner
Laurent Dufour
ldufour at linux.ibm.com
Fri Sep 23 01:02:30 AEST 2022
On 28/07/2022 08:31:19, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Provide an option that holds off queueing indefinitely while the lock
> owner is preempted. This could reduce queueing latencies for very
> overcommitted vcpu situations.
>
> This is disabled by default.
Hi Nick,
I should have missed something here.
If this option is turned on, CPU trying to lock when there is a preempted
owner will spin checking the lock->val and yielding the lock owner CPU.
Am I right?
If yes, why not being queued and spin checking its own value, yielding
against the lock owner CPU? This will generate less cache bouncing, which
is what the queued spinlock is trying to address, isn't it?
Thanks,
Laurent.
> ---
> arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c
> index 24f68bd71e2b..5cfd69931e31 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ static int HEAD_SPINS __read_mostly = (1<<8);
>
> static bool pv_yield_owner __read_mostly = true;
> static bool pv_yield_allow_steal __read_mostly = false;
> +static bool pv_spin_on_preempted_owner __read_mostly = false;
> static bool pv_yield_prev __read_mostly = true;
> static bool pv_yield_propagate_owner __read_mostly = true;
> static bool pv_prod_head __read_mostly = false;
> @@ -220,13 +221,15 @@ static struct qnode *get_tail_qnode(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
> BUG();
> }
>
> -static __always_inline void __yield_to_locked_owner(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, bool paravirt, bool clear_mustq)
> +static __always_inline void __yield_to_locked_owner(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, bool paravirt, bool clear_mustq, bool *preempted)
> {
> int owner;
> u32 yield_count;
>
> BUG_ON(!(val & _Q_LOCKED_VAL));
>
> + *preempted = false;
> +
> if (!paravirt)
> goto relax;
>
> @@ -241,6 +244,8 @@ static __always_inline void __yield_to_locked_owner(struct qspinlock *lock, u32
>
> spin_end();
>
> + *preempted = true;
> +
> /*
> * Read the lock word after sampling the yield count. On the other side
> * there may a wmb because the yield count update is done by the
> @@ -265,14 +270,14 @@ static __always_inline void __yield_to_locked_owner(struct qspinlock *lock, u32
> spin_cpu_relax();
> }
>
> -static __always_inline void yield_to_locked_owner(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, bool paravirt)
> +static __always_inline void yield_to_locked_owner(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, bool paravirt, bool *preempted)
> {
> - __yield_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt, false);
> + __yield_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt, false, preempted);
> }
>
> -static __always_inline void yield_head_to_locked_owner(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, bool paravirt, bool clear_mustq)
> +static __always_inline void yield_head_to_locked_owner(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, bool paravirt, bool clear_mustq, bool *preempted)
> {
> - __yield_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt, clear_mustq);
> + __yield_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt, clear_mustq, preempted);
> }
>
> static __always_inline void propagate_yield_cpu(struct qnode *node, u32 val, int *set_yield_cpu, bool paravirt)
> @@ -364,12 +369,33 @@ static __always_inline void yield_to_prev(struct qspinlock *lock, struct qnode *
>
> static __always_inline bool try_to_steal_lock(struct qspinlock *lock, bool paravirt)
> {
> - int iters;
> + int iters = 0;
> +
> + if (!STEAL_SPINS) {
> + if (paravirt && pv_spin_on_preempted_owner) {
> + spin_begin();
> + for (;;) {
> + u32 val = READ_ONCE(lock->val);
> + bool preempted;
> +
> + if (val & _Q_MUST_Q_VAL)
> + break;
> + if (!(val & _Q_LOCKED_VAL))
> + break;
> + if (!vcpu_is_preempted(get_owner_cpu(val)))
> + break;
> + yield_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt, &preempted);
> + }
> + spin_end();
> + }
> + return false;
> + }
>
> /* Attempt to steal the lock */
> spin_begin();
> for (;;) {
> u32 val = READ_ONCE(lock->val);
> + bool preempted;
>
> if (val & _Q_MUST_Q_VAL)
> break;
> @@ -382,9 +408,22 @@ static __always_inline bool try_to_steal_lock(struct qspinlock *lock, bool parav
> continue;
> }
>
> - yield_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt);
> -
> - iters++;
> + yield_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt, &preempted);
> +
> + if (paravirt && preempted) {
> + if (!pv_spin_on_preempted_owner)
> + iters++;
> + /*
> + * pv_spin_on_preempted_owner don't increase iters
> + * while the owner is preempted -- we won't interfere
> + * with it by definition. This could introduce some
> + * latency issue if we continually observe preempted
> + * owners, but hopefully that's a rare corner case of
> + * a badly oversubscribed system.
> + */
> + } else {
> + iters++;
> + }
>
> if (iters >= get_steal_spins(paravirt, false))
> break;
> @@ -463,8 +502,10 @@ static __always_inline void queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(struct qspinlock *lock, b
> /* We're at the head of the waitqueue, wait for the lock. */
> spin_begin();
> while ((val = READ_ONCE(lock->val)) & _Q_LOCKED_VAL) {
> + bool preempted;
> +
> propagate_yield_cpu(node, val, &set_yield_cpu, paravirt);
> - yield_head_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt, false);
> + yield_head_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt, false, &preempted);
> }
> spin_end();
>
> @@ -486,11 +527,20 @@ static __always_inline void queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(struct qspinlock *lock, b
> /* We're at the head of the waitqueue, wait for the lock. */
> spin_begin();
> while ((val = READ_ONCE(lock->val)) & _Q_LOCKED_VAL) {
> + bool preempted;
> +
> propagate_yield_cpu(node, val, &set_yield_cpu, paravirt);
> yield_head_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt,
> - pv_yield_allow_steal && set_mustq);
> + pv_yield_allow_steal && set_mustq,
> + &preempted);
> +
> + if (paravirt && preempted) {
> + if (!pv_spin_on_preempted_owner)
> + iters++;
> + } else {
> + iters++;
> + }
>
> - iters++;
> if (!set_mustq && iters >= get_head_spins(paravirt)) {
> set_mustq = true;
> lock_set_mustq(lock);
> @@ -663,6 +713,22 @@ static int pv_yield_allow_steal_get(void *data, u64 *val)
>
> DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(fops_pv_yield_allow_steal, pv_yield_allow_steal_get, pv_yield_allow_steal_set, "%llu\n");
>
> +static int pv_spin_on_preempted_owner_set(void *data, u64 val)
> +{
> + pv_spin_on_preempted_owner = !!val;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pv_spin_on_preempted_owner_get(void *data, u64 *val)
> +{
> + *val = pv_spin_on_preempted_owner;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(fops_pv_spin_on_preempted_owner, pv_spin_on_preempted_owner_get, pv_spin_on_preempted_owner_set, "%llu\n");
> +
> static int pv_yield_prev_set(void *data, u64 val)
> {
> pv_yield_prev = !!val;
> @@ -719,6 +785,7 @@ static __init int spinlock_debugfs_init(void)
> if (is_shared_processor()) {
> debugfs_create_file("qspl_pv_yield_owner", 0600, arch_debugfs_dir, NULL, &fops_pv_yield_owner);
> debugfs_create_file("qspl_pv_yield_allow_steal", 0600, arch_debugfs_dir, NULL, &fops_pv_yield_allow_steal);
> + debugfs_create_file("qspl_pv_spin_on_preempted_owner", 0600, arch_debugfs_dir, NULL, &fops_pv_spin_on_preempted_owner);
> debugfs_create_file("qspl_pv_yield_prev", 0600, arch_debugfs_dir, NULL, &fops_pv_yield_prev);
> debugfs_create_file("qspl_pv_yield_propagate_owner", 0600, arch_debugfs_dir, NULL, &fops_pv_yield_propagate_owner);
> debugfs_create_file("qspl_pv_prod_head", 0600, arch_debugfs_dir, NULL, &fops_pv_prod_head);
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list