[PATCH v2 09/10] drm/ofdrm: Add per-model device function

[Thomas Zimmermann]

Hi

Am 05.08.22 um 02:22 schrieb Benjamin Herrenschmidt:
> On Tue, 2022-07-26 at 16:40 +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 03:38:37PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> On 7/20/22 16:27, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>>>> Add a per-model device-function structure in preparation of adding
>>>> color-management support. Detection of the individual models has been
>>>> taken from fbdev's offb.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm at redhat.com>
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> +static bool is_avivo(__be32 vendor, __be32 device)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	/* This will match most R5xx */
>>>> +	return (vendor == 0x1002) &&
>>>> +	       ((device >= 0x7100 && device < 0x7800) || (device >= 0x9400));
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> Maybe add some constant macros to not have these magic numbers ?
>>
>> This is based on the existing fbdev implementation's magic numbers:
>>
>> drivers/video/fbdev/offb.c:                 ((*did >= 0x7100 && *did < 0x7800) ||
>>
>> Of course, it would be great if somebody knowledgeable could clarify
>> those.
> 
> I don't think anybody remembers :-) Vendor 0x1002 is PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI,

I do :)

> but the rest is basically ranges of PCI IDs for which we don't have
> symbolic constants.

Should we add them to the official list in pci_ids.h?  I cannot find 
0x7800. The others are R520 and R600.

Best regards
Thomas

> 
> Cheers,
> Ben.
> 

-- 
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20220921/4fddb482/attachment.sig>