[PATCH 2/2] tools/perf: Fix out of bound access to cpu mask array
R Nageswara Sastry
rnsastry at linux.ibm.com
Mon Sep 5 16:56:58 AEST 2022
On 05/09/22 10:24 am, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> The cpu mask init code in "record__mmap_cpu_mask_init"
> function access "bits" array part of "struct mmap_cpu_mask".
> The size of this array is the value from cpu__max_cpu().cpu.
> This array is used to contain the cpumask value for each
> cpu. While setting bit for each cpu, it calls "set_bit" function
> which access index in "bits" array. If we provide a command
> line option to -C which is greater than the number of CPU's
> present in the system, the set_bit could access an array
> member which is out-of the array size. This is because
> currently, there is no boundary check for the CPU. This will
> result in seg fault:
>
> <<>>
> ./perf record -C 12341234 ls
> Perf can support 2048 CPUs. Consider raising MAX_NR_CPUS
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> <<>>
>
> Debugging with gdb, points to function flow as below:
>
> <<>>
> set_bit
> record__mmap_cpu_mask_init
> record__init_thread_default_masks
> record__init_thread_masks
> cmd_record
> <<>>
>
> Fix this by adding boundary check for the array.
>
> After the patch:
> <<>>
> ./perf record -C 12341234 ls
> Perf can support 2048 CPUs. Consider raising MAX_NR_CPUS
> Failed to initialize parallel data streaming masks
> <<>>
>
> With this fix, if -C is given a non-exsiting CPU, perf
> record will fail with:
>
> <<>>
> ./perf record -C 50 ls
> Failed to initialize parallel data streaming masks
> <<>>
>
> Reported-by: Nageswara Sastry <rnsastry at linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Nageswara Sastry <rnsastry at linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> index 4713f0f3a6cf..09b68d76bbdc 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> @@ -3358,16 +3358,22 @@ static struct option __record_options[] = {
>
> struct option *record_options = __record_options;
>
> -static void record__mmap_cpu_mask_init(struct mmap_cpu_mask *mask, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus)
> +static int record__mmap_cpu_mask_init(struct mmap_cpu_mask *mask, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus)
> {
> struct perf_cpu cpu;
> int idx;
>
> if (cpu_map__is_dummy(cpus))
> - return;
> + return 0;
>
> - perf_cpu_map__for_each_cpu(cpu, idx, cpus)
> + perf_cpu_map__for_each_cpu(cpu, idx, cpus) {
> + /* Return ENODEV is input cpu is greater than max cpu */
> + if ((unsigned long)cpu.cpu > mask->nbits)
> + return -ENODEV;
> set_bit(cpu.cpu, mask->bits);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int record__mmap_cpu_mask_init_spec(struct mmap_cpu_mask *mask, const char *mask_spec)
> @@ -3379,7 +3385,9 @@ static int record__mmap_cpu_mask_init_spec(struct mmap_cpu_mask *mask, const cha
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> bitmap_zero(mask->bits, mask->nbits);
> - record__mmap_cpu_mask_init(mask, cpus);
> + if (record__mmap_cpu_mask_init(mask, cpus))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> perf_cpu_map__put(cpus);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -3461,7 +3469,12 @@ static int record__init_thread_masks_spec(struct record *rec, struct perf_cpu_ma
> pr_err("Failed to allocate CPUs mask\n");
> return ret;
> }
> - record__mmap_cpu_mask_init(&cpus_mask, cpus);
> +
> + ret = record__mmap_cpu_mask_init(&cpus_mask, cpus);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("Failed to init cpu mask\n");
> + goto out_free_cpu_mask;
> + }
>
> ret = record__thread_mask_alloc(&full_mask, cpu__max_cpu().cpu);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -3702,7 +3715,8 @@ static int record__init_thread_default_masks(struct record *rec, struct perf_cpu
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - record__mmap_cpu_mask_init(&rec->thread_masks->maps, cpus);
> + if (record__mmap_cpu_mask_init(&rec->thread_masks->maps, cpus))
> + return -ENODEV;
>
> rec->nr_threads = 1;
>
--
Thanks and Regards
R.Nageswara Sastry
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list