[PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc/math-emu: Remove -w build flag and fix warnings

Nathan Chancellor nathan at kernel.org
Sat Sep 3 02:11:48 AEST 2022


On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 10:59:54AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 08:37:23AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 12:08:55PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > > This should have been detected by gcc at build time, but due to
> > > '-w' flag it went undetected.
> > > 
> > > Removing that flag leads to many warnings hence errors.
> 
> > Thanks for figuring out what was going on here! I took this patch for a
> > spin with clang and it has a few more errors around
> > -Wimplicit-fallthrough:
> 
> Maybe add -Wno-implicit-fallthrough?  This code is a copy from outside
> the kernel, no one has ever wanted to maintain it, if nothing else (the
> more politically correct formulation is "we cannot as easily pick up
> improvements from upstream if we modify stuff").

Sure, we could do something like this if you preferred:

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/math-emu/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/math-emu/Makefile
index 26fef2e5672e..ed775747a2a5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/math-emu/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/math-emu/Makefile
@@ -16,3 +16,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SPE)		+= math_efp.o
 
 CFLAGS_fabs.o = -fno-builtin-fabs
 CFLAGS_math.o = -fno-builtin-fabs
+
+ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
+ccflags-remove-y := $(CONFIG_CC_IMPLICIT_FALLTHROUGH)
+endif

At the same time, I see other modifications to these files that appear
to be for the kernel only so I suspect that this is already in the "we
cannot as easily pick up improvements from upstream" category,
regardless of that diff. No strong opinion from me, although I see
Christophe already included my suggestion in the most recent series:

https://lore.kernel.org/2663961738a46073713786d4efeb53100ca156e7.1662134272.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu/

Cheers,
Nathan


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list