[PATCH 1/2] MAINTAINERS: Broaden scope of simpledrm entry

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello Thomas,

On 5/18/22 20:30, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> There will be more DRM drivers for firmware-provided framebuffers. Use
> the existing entry for simpledrm instead of adding a new one for each
> driver. Also add DRM's aperture helpers, which are part of the driver's
> infrastructure.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm at redhat.com>

I think you could push this without waiting for 2/2 to be ready.

>  MAINTAINERS | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 5c1fd93d9050..43d833273ae9 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -6388,13 +6388,15 @@ S:	Orphan / Obsolete
>  F:	drivers/gpu/drm/savage/
>  F:	include/uapi/drm/savage_drm.h
>  
> -DRM DRIVER FOR SIMPLE FRAMEBUFFERS
> +DRM DRIVER FOR FIRMWARE FRAMEBUFFERS
>  M:	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de>
>  M:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm at redhat.com>
>  L:	dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>  S:	Maintained
>  T:	git git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc
> +F:	drivers/gpu/drm/drm_aperture.c
>  F:	drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/simpledrm.c
> +F:	include/drm/drm_aperture.h

I wonder if we could add drivers/firmware/sysfb* as well, it certainly is
related since is the place where different platforms register the device.

But it's not in drivers/gpu, hence the question if we could include it 
(and possibly merge it through drm-misc as well, etc).

Dave, Daniel, what do you think ?

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat