[PATCH v2 3/3] arch/*/: remove CONFIG_VIRT_TO_BUS

[Michael Schmitz]

Hi Geert,

On 28/06/22 19:03, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
>> Leaving the bounce buffer handling in place, and taking a few other
>> liberties - this is what converting the easiest case (a3000 SCSI) might
>> look like. Any obvious mistakes? The mvme147 driver would be very
>> similar to handle (after conversion to a platform device).
> Thanks, looks reasonable.
Thanks, I'll take care of Arnd's comments and post a corrected version 
later.
>> The driver allocates bounce buffers using kmalloc if it hits an
>> unaligned data buffer - can such buffers still even happen these days?
> No idea.
Hmmm - I think I'll stick a WARN_ONCE() in there so we know whether this 
code path is still being used.
>
>> If I understand dma_map_single() correctly, the resulting dma handle
>> would be equally misaligned?
>>
>> To allocate a bounce buffer, would it be OK to use dma_alloc_coherent()
>> even though AFAIU memory used for DMA buffers generally isn't consistent
>> on m68k?
>>
>> Thinking ahead to the other two Amiga drivers - I wonder whether
>> allocating a static bounce buffer or a DMA pool at driver init is likely
>> to succeed if the kernel runs from the low 16 MB RAM chunk? It certainly
>> won't succeed if the kernel runs from a higher memory address, so the
>> present bounce buffer logic around amiga_chip_alloc() might still need
>> to be used here.
>>
>> Leaves the question whether converting the gvp11 and a2091 drivers is
>> actually worth it, if bounce buffers still have to be handled explicitly.
> A2091 should be straight-forward, as A3000 is basically A2091 on the
> motherboard (comparing the two drivers, looks like someone's been
> sprinkling mb()s over the A3000 driver).

Yep, and at least the ones in the dma_setup() function are there for no 
reason (the compiler won't reorder stores around the cache flush calls, 
I hope?).

Just leaves the 24 bit DMA mask there (and likely need for bounce buffers).

> I don't have any of these SCSI host adapters (not counting the A590
> (~A2091) expansion of the old A500, which is not Linux-capable, and
>   hasn't been powered on for 20 years).

I wonder whether kullervo has survived - that one was an A3000. Should 
have gone to Adrian a few years ago...

Cheers,

     Michael


>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                          Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                  -- Linus Torvalds