[RFC PATCH 2/6] testing/pkeys: Don't use uninitialized variable
Sohil Mehta
sohil.mehta at intel.com
Tue Jun 14 08:48:56 AEST 2022
On 6/10/2022 4:35 PM, ira.weiny at intel.com wrote:
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
> index d0183c381859..43e47de19c0d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
> @@ -1225,9 +1225,9 @@ void test_pkey_alloc_exhaust(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
> int new_pkey;
> dprintf1("%s() alloc loop: %d\n", __func__, i);
> new_pkey = alloc_pkey();
> - dprintf4("%s()::%d, err: %d pkey_reg: 0x%016llx"
> + dprintf4("%s()::%d, errno: %d pkey_reg: 0x%016llx"
What is errno referring to over here? There are a few things happening
in alloc_pkey(). I guess it would show the latest error that happened.
Does errno need to be set to 0 before the call?
Also, would it be useful to print the return value (new_pkey) from
alloc_pkey() here?
> " shadow: 0x%016llx\n",
> - __func__, __LINE__, err, __read_pkey_reg(),
> + __func__, __LINE__, errno, __read_pkey_reg(),
> shadow_pkey_reg);
> read_pkey_reg(); /* for shadow checking */
> dprintf2("%s() errno: %d ENOSPC: %d\n", __func__, errno, ENOSPC);
Sohil
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list