[RFC PATCH 1/6] testing/pkeys: Add command line options
Ira Weiny
ira.weiny at intel.com
Tue Jun 14 09:41:35 AEST 2022
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 03:31:02PM -0700, Mehta, Sohil wrote:
> On 6/10/2022 4:35 PM, ira.weiny at intel.com wrote:
>
> > Add command line options for debug level and number of iterations.
> >
> > $ ./protection_keys_64 -h
> > Usage: ./protection_keys_64 [-h,-d,-i <iter>]
> > --help,-h This help
> > --debug,-d Increase debug level for each -d
>
> Is this mechanism (of counting d's) commonplace in other selftests as well?
> Looking at the test code for pkeys the debug levels run from 1-5. That feels
> like quite a few d's to input :)
I've seen (and used) it before yes. See ibnetdiscover.
...
# Debugging flags
-d raise the IB debugging level. May be used several times (-ddd or -d -d -d).
...
-v increase the application verbosity level. May be used several times (-vv or -v -v -v)
...
- https://linux.die.net/man/8/ibnetdiscover
But a much more mainstream example I can think of is verbosity level with
lspci.
16:29:12 > lspci -h
...
Display options:
-v Be verbose (-vv or -vvv for higher verbosity)
...
>
> Would it be easier to input the number in the command line directly?
>
> Either way it would be useful to know the debug range in the help.
> Maybe something like:
> --debug,-d Increase debug level for each -d (1-5)
I'm inclined not to do this because it would encode the max debug level. On
the other hand I'm not sure why there are 5 levels now. ;-)
Having the multiple options specified was an easy way to maintain the large
number of levels.
Ira
>
> The patch seems fine to me otherwise.
>
> > --iterations,-i <iter> repeate test <iter> times
> > default: 22
> >
>
> Thanks,
> Sohil
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list