[PATCH 1/2] powerpc: drop dependency on <asm/machdep.h> in archrandom.h

Michael Ellerman mpe at ellerman.id.au
Tue Jul 26 16:57:38 AEST 2022


Yury Norov <yury.norov at gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 09:28:12AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 12:19 AM Yury Norov <yury.norov at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > archrandom.h includes <asm/machdep.h> to refer ppc_md. This causes
>> > circular header dependency, if generic nodemask.h  includes random.h:
>> >
>> > In file included from include/linux/cred.h:16,
>> >                  from include/linux/seq_file.h:13,
>> >                  from arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h:6,
>> >                  from arch/powerpc/include/asm/archrandom.h:5,
>> >                  from include/linux/random.h:109,
>> >                  from include/linux/nodemask.h:97,
>> >                  from include/linux/list_lru.h:12,
>> >                  from include/linux/fs.h:13,
>> >                  from include/linux/compat.h:17,
>> >                  from arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c:12:
>> > include/linux/sched.h:1203:9: error: unknown type name 'nodemask_t'
>> >  1203 |         nodemask_t                      mems_allowed;
>> >       |         ^~~~~~~~~~
>> >
>> > Fix it by removing <asm/machdep.h> dependency from archrandom.h
>> 
>> ...
>> 
>> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_power_off);
>> 
>> ^^^ (Note this and read below)
>> 
>> ...
>> 
>> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_get_random_seed_long);
>> 
>> It can't be like this. Brief browsing of the callees shows that.
>
> Is my understanding correct that you're suggesting to make it GPL?
>
> ppc_md is exported with EXPORT_SYMBOL(), and the function is in header,
> so it's available for non-GPL code now. I don't want to change it.

That's true, your change maintains the status quo.

But I think we actually don't need it exported to modules, I think it's
a private detail of the RNG <-> architecture interface, not something
that modules should be calling.

So I think it's OK to drop the EXPORT_SYMBOL, either in this patch or a
subsequent one if you don't want to rebase.

cheers


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list