[PATCH v1 4/5] powerpc/44x: Fix build failure with GCC 12 (unrecognized opcode: `wrteei')

Arnd Bergmann arnd at arndb.de
Tue Jul 12 01:05:04 AEST 2022


On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 4:19 PM Christophe Leroy
<christophe.leroy at csgroup.eu> wrote:
> @@ -183,6 +183,18 @@ config 405_CPU
>         bool "40x family"
>         depends on 40x
>
> +config 440_CPU
> +       bool "440 (44x family)"
> +       depends on 44x
> +
> +config 464_CPU
> +       bool "464 (44x family)"
> +       depends on 44x
> +
> +config 476_CPU
> +       bool "476 (47x family)"
> +       depends on PPC_47x

Is there any value in building for -mcpu=440 or -mcpu=464 when targeting a 476?
Maybe add another !PPC_47x dependency for the first two. Ideally we would also
enforce that 440/464 based boards cannot be selected together with 476, though
I guess that is a separate issue.

Is there a practical difference between 440 and 464 when building kernels?
gcc seems to treat them the same way, so maybe one option for both is enough
here.

     Arnd


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list