[PATCH V6 16/20] riscv: compat: vdso: Add rv32 VDSO base code implementation

[Guo Ren]

On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 11:50 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 4:42 PM Guo Ren <guoren at kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Arnd & Palmer,
> >
> > Here is the new modified compat_vdso/Makefile, please have a look,
> > first. Then I would update it to v7:
> > ===========================================
> > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > #
> > # Makefile for compat_vdso
> > #
> >
> > # Symbols present in the compat_vdso
> > compat_vdso-syms  = rt_sigreturn
> > compat_vdso-syms += getcpu
> > compat_vdso-syms += flush_icache
> >
> > ifdef CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT
> >         COMPAT_CC := $(CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT)gcc
> >         COMPAT_LD := $(CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT)ld
> > else
> >         COMPAT_CC := $(CC)
> >         COMPAT_LD := $(LD)
> > endif
> >
> > COMPAT_CC_FLAGS := -march=rv32g -mabi=ilp32
> > COMPAT_LD_FLAGS := -melf32lriscv
>
> Have you come across a case in which a separate cross toolchain
> is required? If not, I would leave this out and just set the flags for the
> normal toolchain.
Okay

>
> I also think it would be a nicer split to build the two vdso variants
> as vdso64/vdso32 rather than vdso/compat_vdso. That way,
> the build procedure can be kept as close as possible to the
> native 32-bit build.
Yes, current native 32-bit vdso & 64-bit vdso use the same
vdso/Makfile. So, I think it could be another patch for this cleanup.

>
>         Arnd



-- 
Best Regards
 Guo Ren

ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/