[PATCH v2 09/13] powerpc/ftrace: Implement CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
Naveen N. Rao
naveen.n.rao at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Feb 15 02:25:33 AEDT 2022
Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Implement CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS. It accelerates the call
> of livepatching.
>
> Also note that powerpc being the last one to convert to
> CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS, it will now be possible to remove
> klp_arch_set_pc() on all architectures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy at csgroup.eu>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/livepatch.h | 4 +---
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> index cdac2115eb00..e2b1792b2aae 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> @@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ config PPC
> select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
> select HAVE_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW
> select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
> + select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS if MPROFILE_KERNEL || PPC32
> select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS if MPROFILE_KERNEL || PPC32
> select HAVE_EBPF_JIT
> select HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS if !(CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN && POWER7_CPU)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h
> index b3f6184f77ea..45c3d6f11daa 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,23 @@ static inline unsigned long ftrace_call_adjust(unsigned long addr)
> struct dyn_arch_ftrace {
> struct module *mod;
> };
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
> +struct ftrace_regs {
> + struct pt_regs regs;
> +};
> +
> +static __always_inline struct pt_regs *arch_ftrace_get_regs(struct ftrace_regs *fregs)
> +{
> + return &fregs->regs;
> +}
I think this is wrong. We need to differentiate between ftrace_caller()
and ftrace_regs_caller() here, and only return pt_regs if coming in
through ftrace_regs_caller() (i.e., FL_SAVE_REGS is set).
> +
> +static __always_inline void ftrace_instruction_pointer_set(struct ftrace_regs *fregs,
> + unsigned long ip)
> +{
> + regs_set_return_ip(&fregs->regs, ip);
Should we use that helper here? regs_set_return_ip() also updates some
other state related to taking interrupts and I don't think it makes
sense for use with ftrace.
- Naveen
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list