[PATCH v2 5/5] powerpc: Select ARCH_WANTS_MODULES_DATA_IN_VMALLOC on book3s/32 and 8xx
Michael Ellerman
mpe at ellerman.id.au
Mon Feb 7 12:19:06 AEDT 2022
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy at csgroup.eu> writes:
> Le 03/02/2022 à 06:39, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
>> Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof at kernel.org> writes:
>>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:28:12AM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>>> book3s/32 and 8xx have a separate area for allocating modules,
>>>> defined by MODULES_VADDR / MODULES_END.
>>>>
>>>> On book3s/32, it is not possible to protect against execution
>>>> on a page basis. A full 256M segment is either Exec or NoExec.
>>>> The module area is in an Exec segment while vmalloc area is
>>>> in a NoExec segment.
>>>>
>>>> In order to protect module data against execution, select
>>>> ARCH_WANTS_MODULES_DATA_IN_VMALLOC.
>>>>
>>>> For the 8xx (and possibly other 32 bits platform in the future),
>>>> there is no such constraint on Exec/NoExec protection, however
>>>> there is a critical distance between kernel functions and callers
>>>> that needs to remain below 32Mbytes in order to avoid costly
>>>> trampolines. By allocating data outside of module area, we
>>>> increase the chance for module text to remain within acceptable
>>>> distance from kernel core text.
>>>>
>>>> So select ARCH_WANTS_MODULES_DATA_IN_VMALLOC for 8xx as well.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy at csgroup.eu>
>>>> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe at ellerman.id.au>
>>>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org>
>>>> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus at samba.org>
>>>
>>> Cc list first and then the SOB.
>>
>> Just delete the Cc: list, it's meaningless.
>>
>
> Was an easy way to copy you automatically with 'git send-email', but
> getting it through linuxppc-dev list is enough I guess ?
It's useful for making the tooling Cc the right people, it's fine to use
them for that.
But there's no value in committing them to the git history, I actively
strip them when applying. The fact that someone is Cc'ed on a patch
tells you nothing, given the volume of mail maintainers receive.
The link tag back to the original submission gives you the Cc list
anyway.
cheers
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list