[PATCH 08/17] powerpc/qspinlock: paravirt yield to lock owner

Jordan Niethe jniethe5 at gmail.com
Fri Aug 12 12:01:15 AEST 2022


 On Thu, 2022-07-28 at 16:31 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Waiters spinning on the lock word should yield to the lock owner if the
> vCPU is preempted. This improves performance when the hypervisor has
> oversubscribed physical CPUs.
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c
> index aa26cfe21f18..55286ac91da5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>  #include <linux/percpu.h>
>  #include <linux/smp.h>
>  #include <asm/qspinlock.h>
> +#include <asm/paravirt.h>
>  
>  #define MAX_NODES	4
>  
> @@ -24,14 +25,16 @@ static int STEAL_SPINS __read_mostly = (1<<5);
>  static bool MAYBE_STEALERS __read_mostly = true;
>  static int HEAD_SPINS __read_mostly = (1<<8);
>  
> +static bool pv_yield_owner __read_mostly = true;

Not macro case for these globals? To me name does not make it super clear this
is a boolean. What about pv_yield_owner_enabled?

> +
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct qnodes, qnodes);
>  
> -static __always_inline int get_steal_spins(void)
> +static __always_inline int get_steal_spins(bool paravirt)
>  {
>  	return STEAL_SPINS;
>  }
>  
> -static __always_inline int get_head_spins(void)
> +static __always_inline int get_head_spins(bool paravirt)
>  {
>  	return HEAD_SPINS;
>  }
> @@ -46,7 +49,11 @@ static inline int get_tail_cpu(u32 val)
>  	return (val >> _Q_TAIL_CPU_OFFSET) - 1;
>  }
>  
> -/* Take the lock by setting the bit, no other CPUs may concurrently lock it. */
> +static inline int get_owner_cpu(u32 val)
> +{
> +	return (val & _Q_OWNER_CPU_MASK) >> _Q_OWNER_CPU_OFFSET;
> +}
> +
>  /* Take the lock by setting the lock bit, no other CPUs will touch it. */
>  static __always_inline void lock_set_locked(struct qspinlock *lock)
>  {
> @@ -180,7 +187,45 @@ static struct qnode *get_tail_qnode(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
>  	BUG();
>  }
>  
> -static inline bool try_to_steal_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
> +static __always_inline void yield_to_locked_owner(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, bool paravirt)

This name doesn't seem correct for the non paravirt case.

> +{
> +	int owner;
> +	u32 yield_count;
> +
> +	BUG_ON(!(val & _Q_LOCKED_VAL));
> +
> +	if (!paravirt)
> +		goto relax;
> +
> +	if (!pv_yield_owner)
> +		goto relax;
> +
> +	owner = get_owner_cpu(val);
> +	yield_count = yield_count_of(owner);
> +
> +	if ((yield_count & 1) == 0)
> +		goto relax; /* owner vcpu is running */

I wonder why not use vcpu_is_preempted()?

> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Read the lock word after sampling the yield count. On the other side
> +	 * there may a wmb because the yield count update is done by the
> +	 * hypervisor preemption and the value update by the OS, however this
> +	 * ordering might reduce the chance of out of order accesses and
> +	 * improve the heuristic.
> +	 */
> +	smp_rmb();
> +
> +	if (READ_ONCE(lock->val) == val) {
> +		yield_to_preempted(owner, yield_count);
> +		/* Don't relax if we yielded. Maybe we should? */
> +		return;
> +	}
> +relax:
> +	cpu_relax();
> +}
> +
> +
> +static __always_inline bool try_to_steal_lock(struct qspinlock *lock, bool paravirt)
>  {
>  	int iters;
>  
> @@ -197,18 +242,18 @@ static inline bool try_to_steal_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> -		cpu_relax();
> +		yield_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt);
>  
>  		iters++;
>  
> -		if (iters >= get_steal_spins())
> +		if (iters >= get_steal_spins(paravirt))
>  			break;
>  	}
>  
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> -static inline void queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(struct qspinlock *lock)
> +static __always_inline void queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(struct qspinlock *lock, bool paravirt)
>  {
>  	struct qnodes *qnodesp;
>  	struct qnode *next, *node;
> @@ -260,7 +305,7 @@ static inline void queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(struct qspinlock *lock)
>  	if (!MAYBE_STEALERS) {
>  		/* We're at the head of the waitqueue, wait for the lock. */
>  		while ((val = READ_ONCE(lock->val)) & _Q_LOCKED_VAL)
> -			cpu_relax();
> +			yield_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt);
>  
>  		/* If we're the last queued, must clean up the tail. */
>  		if ((val & _Q_TAIL_CPU_MASK) == tail) {
> @@ -278,10 +323,10 @@ static inline void queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(struct qspinlock *lock)
>  again:
>  		/* We're at the head of the waitqueue, wait for the lock. */
>  		while ((val = READ_ONCE(lock->val)) & _Q_LOCKED_VAL) {
> -			cpu_relax();
> +			yield_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt);
>  
>  			iters++;
> -			if (!set_mustq && iters >= get_head_spins()) {
> +			if (!set_mustq && iters >= get_head_spins(paravirt)) {
>  				set_mustq = true;
>  				lock_set_mustq(lock);
>  				val |= _Q_MUST_Q_VAL;
> @@ -320,10 +365,15 @@ static inline void queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(struct qspinlock *lock)
>  
>  void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock)
>  {
> -	if (try_to_steal_lock(lock))
> -		return;
> -
> -	queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(lock);
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS) && is_shared_processor()) {
> +		if (try_to_steal_lock(lock, true))
> +			return;
> +		queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(lock, true);
> +	} else {
> +		if (try_to_steal_lock(lock, false))
> +			return;
> +		queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(lock, false);
> +	}
>  }

There is not really a need for a conditional: 

bool paravirt = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS) &&
is_shared_processor();

if (try_to_steal_lock(lock, paravirt))
	return;

queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(lock, paravirt);


The paravirt parameter used by the various functions seems always to be
equivalent to (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS) && is_shared_processor()).
I wonder if it would be simpler testing (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS) && is_shared_processor())
(using a helper function) in those functions instead passing it as a parameter?


>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
>  
> @@ -382,10 +432,29 @@ static int head_spins_get(void *data, u64 *val)
>  
>  DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(fops_head_spins, head_spins_get, head_spins_set, "%llu\n");
>  
> +static int pv_yield_owner_set(void *data, u64 val)
> +{
> +	pv_yield_owner = !!val;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pv_yield_owner_get(void *data, u64 *val)
> +{
> +	*val = pv_yield_owner;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(fops_pv_yield_owner, pv_yield_owner_get, pv_yield_owner_set, "%llu\n");
> +
>  static __init int spinlock_debugfs_init(void)
>  {
>  	debugfs_create_file("qspl_steal_spins", 0600, arch_debugfs_dir, NULL, &fops_steal_spins);
>  	debugfs_create_file("qspl_head_spins", 0600, arch_debugfs_dir, NULL, &fops_head_spins);
> +	if (is_shared_processor()) {
> +		debugfs_create_file("qspl_pv_yield_owner", 0600, arch_debugfs_dir, NULL, &fops_pv_yield_owner);
> +	}
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list