[PATCH net-next v2 05/18] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: remove redundant check in mv88e6xxx_port_vlan()

[Jakob Koschel]

> On 12. Apr 2022, at 13:27, Russell King (Oracle) <linux at armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 12:58:17PM +0200, Jakob Koschel wrote:
>> We know that "dev > dst->last_switch" in the "else" block.
>> In other words, that "dev - dst->last_switch" is > 0.
>> 
>> dsa_port_bridge_num_get(dp) can be 0, but the check
>> "if (bridge_num + dst->last_switch != dev) continue", rewritten as
>> "if (bridge_num != dev - dst->last_switch) continue", aka
>> "if (bridge_num != something which cannot be 0) continue",
>> makes it redundant to have the extra "if (!bridge_num) continue" logic,
>> since a bridge_num of zero would have been skipped anyway.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel at gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean at nxp.com>
> 
> Isn't this Vladimir's patch?
> 
> If so, it should be commited as Vladimir as the author, and Vladimir's
> sign-off should appear before yours. When sending out such patches,
> there should be a From: line for Vladimir as the first line in the body
> of the patch email.

yes, you are right. I wasn't sure on how to send those commits, but
I guess if I just set the commit author correctly it should be fine.

regarding the order: I thought I did it correctly doing bottom up but
I confused the order, wasn't on purpose. Sorry about that.

I'll resend after verifying all the authors and sign-offs are correct.

> 
> The same goes for the next mv88e6xxx patch in this series - I think
> both of these are the patches Vladimir sent in his email:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220408123101.p33jpynhqo67hebe@skbuf
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

Thanks for pointing it out!
Jakob