[PATCH] ASoC: fsl: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

[cgel.zte at gmail.com]

From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao at zte.com.cn>

Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci at zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao at zte.com.cn>
---
 sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c
index ed444e8f1d6b..1a2bdf8e76f0 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c
@@ -1050,11 +1050,9 @@ static int fsl_esai_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			goto err_pm_disable;
 	}
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&pdev->dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto err_pm_get_sync;
-	}
 
 	ret = fsl_esai_hw_init(esai_priv);
 	if (ret)
-- 
2.25.1