rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU

Michael Ellerman mpe at ellerman.id.au
Sat Apr 9 00:42:39 AEST 2022


Michael Ellerman <mpe at ellerman.id.au> writes:
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck at kernel.org> writes:
>> On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 05:31:10PM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
>>> Hi
>>> 
>>> I can reproduce it in a ppc virtual cloud server provided by Oregon
>>> State University.  Following is what I do:
>>> 1) curl -l https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/snapshot/linux-5.18-rc1.tar.gz
>>> -o linux-5.18-rc1.tar.gz
>>> 2) tar zxf linux-5.18-rc1.tar.gz
>>> 3) cp config linux-5.18-rc1/.config
>>> 4) cd linux-5.18-rc1
>>> 5) make vmlinux -j 8
>>> 6) qemu-system-ppc64 -kernel vmlinux -nographic -vga none -no-reboot
>>> -smp 2 (QEMU 4.2.1)
>>> 7) after 12 rounds, the bug got reproduced:
>>> (http://154.223.142.244/logs/20220406/qemu.log.txt)
>>
>> Just to make sure, are you both seeing the same thing?  Last I knew,
>> Zhouyi was chasing an RCU-tasks issue that appears only in kernels
>> built with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y, which Miguel does not have set.  Or did
>> I miss something?
>>
>> Miguel is instead seeing an RCU CPU stall warning where RCU's grace-period
>> kthread slept for three milliseconds, but did not wake up for more than
>> 20 seconds.  This kthread would normally have awakened on CPU 1, but
>> CPU 1 looks to me to be very unhealthy, as can be seen in your console
>> output below (but maybe my idea of what is healthy for powerpc systems
>> is outdated).  Please see also the inline annotations.
>>
>> Thoughts from the PPC guys?
>
> I haven't seen it in my testing. But using Miguel's config I can
> reproduce it seemingly on every boot.
>
> For me it bisects to:
>
>   35de589cb879 ("powerpc/time: improve decrementer clockevent processing")
>
> Which seems plausible.
>
> Reverting that on mainline makes the bug go away.
>
> I don't see an obvious bug in the diff, but I could be wrong, or the old
> code was papering over an existing bug?
>
> I'll try and work out what it is about Miguel's config that exposes
> this vs our defconfig, that might give us a clue.

It's CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=n which triggers the stall.

I can reproduce just with:

  $ make ppc64le_guest_defconfig
  $ ./scripts/config -d HIGH_RES_TIMERS

We have no defconfigs that disable HIGH_RES_TIMERS, I didn't even
realise you could disable it TBH :)

The Rust CI has it disabled because I copied that from the x86 defconfig
they were using back when I added the Rust support. I think that was
meant to be a stripped down fast config for CI, but the result is it's
just using a badly tested combination which is not helpful.

So I'll send a patch to turn HIGH_RES_TIMERS on for the Rust CI, and we
can debug this further without blocking them.

cheers


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list