[PATCH v2 4/4] powerpc/pseries/cpuhp: remove obsolete comment from pseries_cpu_die

[Michael Ellerman]

Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413 at gmail.com> writes:
> On 9/27/21 17:19, Nathan Lynch wrote:
>> This comment likely refers to the obsolete DLPAR workflow where some
>> resource state transitions were driven more directly from user space
>> utilities, but it also seems to contradict itself: "Change isolate state to
>> Isolate [...]" is at odds with the preceding sentences, and it does not
>> relate at all to the code that follows.
>
> This comment was added by commit 413f7c405a34, a 2006 commit where Mike
> Ellerman moved code from platform/pseries/smp.c into hotplug-cpu.c.
>
> I checked the original code back in smp.c and this comment was added there
> by commit 1da177e4c3f41, which is Linus's initial git commit, where he mentions
> that he didn't bothered with full history (although it is available somewhere,
> allegedly).
>
> This is enough to say that we can't easily see the history behind this comment.
> I also believe that we're better of without it since it doesn't make sense
> with the current codebase.

It was added by the original CPU hotplug commit for ppc64::

https://github.com/mpe/linux-fullhistory/commit/0e9fd9441cd2113b67b14e739267c9e69761489b


The code was fairly similar:

void __cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
{
	int tries;
	int cpu_status;
	unsigned int pcpu = get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu);

	for (tries = 0; tries < 5; tries++) {
		cpu_status = query_cpu_stopped(pcpu);

		if (cpu_status == 0)
			break;
		set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
		schedule_timeout(HZ);
	}
	if (cpu_status != 0) {
		printk("Querying DEAD? cpu %i (%i) shows %i\n",
		       cpu, pcpu, cpu_status);
	}

	/* Isolation and deallocation are definatly done by
	 * drslot_chrp_cpu.  If they were not they would be
	 * done here.  Change isolate state to Isolate and
	 * change allocation-state to Unusable.
	 */
	paca[cpu].xProcStart = 0;

	/* So we can recognize if it fails to come up next time. */
	cpu_callin_map[cpu] = 0;
}


drslot_chrp_cpu() still exists in drmgr:

  https://github.com/ibm-power-utilities/powerpc-utils/blob/e798c4a09fbf0fa0f421e624cfa366a6c405c9fe/src/drmgr/drslot_chrp_cpu.c#L406


I agree the comment is no longer meaningful and can be removed.

It might be good to then add a comment explaining why we need to set
cpu_start = 0.

It's not immediately clear why we need to. When we bring a CPU back
online in smp_pSeries_kick_cpu() we ask RTAS to start it and then
immediately set cpu_start = 1, ie. there isn't a separate step that sets
cpu_start = 1 for hotplugged CPUs.

cheers