[PATCH v3 8/8] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with cc_platform_has()

Tom Lendacky thomas.lendacky at amd.com
Thu Sep 9 23:10:54 AEST 2021


On 9/9/21 2:25 AM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/8/21 10:58 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h 
>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
>> index ba9dab07c1be..2f26b8fc8d29 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
>> @@ -10,11 +10,6 @@
>>   #include <asm/svm.h>
>> -static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void)
>> -{
>> -    return is_secure_guest();
>> -}
>> -
>>   static inline bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
>>   {
>>       return is_secure_guest();
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/svm.c 
>> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/svm.c
>> index 87f001b4c4e4..c083ecbbae4d 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/svm.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/svm.c
>> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/mm.h>
>>   #include <linux/memblock.h>
>> +#include <linux/cc_platform.h>
>>   #include <asm/machdep.h>
>>   #include <asm/svm.h>
>>   #include <asm/swiotlb.h>
>> @@ -63,7 +64,7 @@ void __init svm_swiotlb_init(void)
>>   int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
>>   {
>> -    if (!mem_encrypt_active())
>> +    if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT))
>>           return 0;
>>       if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(addr))
>> @@ -76,7 +77,7 @@ int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int 
>> numpages)
>>   int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
>>   {
>> -    if (!mem_encrypt_active())
>> +    if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT))
>>           return 0;
>>       if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(addr))
> 
> This change unnecessarily complexifies the two functions. This is due to 
> cc_platform_has() being out-line. It should really remain inline.

Please see previous discussion(s) on this series for why the function is
implemented out of line and for the naming:

V1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1627424773.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com/

V2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1628873970.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com/

Thanks,
Tom

> 
> Before the change we got:
> 
> 0000000000000000 <.set_memory_encrypted>:
>     0:    7d 20 00 a6     mfmsr   r9
>     4:    75 29 00 40     andis.  r9,r9,64
>     8:    41 82 00 48     beq     50 <.set_memory_encrypted+0x50>
>     c:    78 69 04 20     clrldi  r9,r3,48
>    10:    2c 29 00 00     cmpdi   r9,0
>    14:    40 82 00 4c     bne     60 <.set_memory_encrypted+0x60>
>    18:    7c 08 02 a6     mflr    r0
>    1c:    7c 85 23 78     mr      r5,r4
>    20:    78 64 85 02     rldicl  r4,r3,48,20
>    24:    61 23 f1 34     ori     r3,r9,61748
>    28:    f8 01 00 10     std     r0,16(r1)
>    2c:    f8 21 ff 91     stdu    r1,-112(r1)
>    30:    48 00 00 01     bl      30 <.set_memory_encrypted+0x30>
>              30: R_PPC64_REL24    .ucall_norets
>    34:    60 00 00 00     nop
>    38:    38 60 00 00     li      r3,0
>    3c:    38 21 00 70     addi    r1,r1,112
>    40:    e8 01 00 10     ld      r0,16(r1)
>    44:    7c 08 03 a6     mtlr    r0
>    48:    4e 80 00 20     blr
>    50:    38 60 00 00     li      r3,0
>    54:    4e 80 00 20     blr
>    60:    38 60 ff ea     li      r3,-22
>    64:    4e 80 00 20     blr
> 
> After the change we get:
> 
> 0000000000000000 <.set_memory_encrypted>:
>     0:    7c 08 02 a6     mflr    r0
>     4:    fb c1 ff f0     std     r30,-16(r1)
>     8:    fb e1 ff f8     std     r31,-8(r1)
>     c:    7c 7f 1b 78     mr      r31,r3
>    10:    38 60 00 00     li      r3,0
>    14:    7c 9e 23 78     mr      r30,r4
>    18:    f8 01 00 10     std     r0,16(r1)
>    1c:    f8 21 ff 81     stdu    r1,-128(r1)
>    20:    48 00 00 01     bl      20 <.set_memory_encrypted+0x20>
>              20: R_PPC64_REL24    .cc_platform_has
>    24:    60 00 00 00     nop
>    28:    2c 23 00 00     cmpdi   r3,0
>    2c:    41 82 00 44     beq     70 <.set_memory_encrypted+0x70>
>    30:    7b e9 04 20     clrldi  r9,r31,48
>    34:    2c 29 00 00     cmpdi   r9,0
>    38:    40 82 00 58     bne     90 <.set_memory_encrypted+0x90>
>    3c:    38 60 00 00     li      r3,0
>    40:    7f c5 f3 78     mr      r5,r30
>    44:    7b e4 85 02     rldicl  r4,r31,48,20
>    48:    60 63 f1 34     ori     r3,r3,61748
>    4c:    48 00 00 01     bl      4c <.set_memory_encrypted+0x4c>
>              4c: R_PPC64_REL24    .ucall_norets
>    50:    60 00 00 00     nop
>    54:    38 60 00 00     li      r3,0
>    58:    38 21 00 80     addi    r1,r1,128
>    5c:    e8 01 00 10     ld      r0,16(r1)
>    60:    eb c1 ff f0     ld      r30,-16(r1)
>    64:    eb e1 ff f8     ld      r31,-8(r1)
>    68:    7c 08 03 a6     mtlr    r0
>    6c:    4e 80 00 20     blr
>    70:    38 21 00 80     addi    r1,r1,128
>    74:    38 60 00 00     li      r3,0
>    78:    e8 01 00 10     ld      r0,16(r1)
>    7c:    eb c1 ff f0     ld      r30,-16(r1)
>    80:    eb e1 ff f8     ld      r31,-8(r1)
>    84:    7c 08 03 a6     mtlr    r0
>    88:    4e 80 00 20     blr
>    90:    38 60 ff ea     li      r3,-22
>    94:    4b ff ff c4     b       58 <.set_memory_encrypted+0x58>
> 


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list