[PATCH v3 04/12] powerpc: Prepare func_desc_t for refactorisation
Christophe Leroy
christophe.leroy at csgroup.eu
Mon Oct 18 18:08:54 AEDT 2021
Le 18/10/2021 à 08:27, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
> Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of October 17, 2021 10:38 pm:
>> In preparation of making func_desc_t generic, change the ELFv2
>> version to a struct containing 'addr' element.
>>
>> This allows using single helpers common to ELFv1 and ELFv2.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy at csgroup.eu>
>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c | 32 ++++++++++++++------------------
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
>> index a89da0ee25e2..b687ef88c4c4 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
>> @@ -33,19 +33,13 @@
>> #ifdef PPC64_ELF_ABI_v2
>>
>> /* An address is simply the address of the function. */
>> -typedef unsigned long func_desc_t;
>> +typedef struct {
>> + unsigned long addr;
>> +} func_desc_t;
>
> I'm not quite following why this change is done. I guess it is so you
> can move this func_desc_t type into core code, but why do that? Is it
> just to avoid using the preprocessor?
I explained it in patch 7 but yes it probably also deserves some more
explanation here as well.
That's right, it's to avoid having to spread #ifdefs everywhere.
>
> On its own this patch looks okay.
>
> Acked-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin at gmail.com>
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list