[PATCH v3 04/12] powerpc: Prepare func_desc_t for refactorisation

Christophe Leroy christophe.leroy at csgroup.eu
Mon Oct 18 18:08:54 AEDT 2021



Le 18/10/2021 à 08:27, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
> Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of October 17, 2021 10:38 pm:
>> In preparation of making func_desc_t generic, change the ELFv2
>> version to a struct containing 'addr' element.
>>
>> This allows using single helpers common to ELFv1 and ELFv2.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy at csgroup.eu>
> 
>> ---
>>   arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c | 32 ++++++++++++++------------------
>>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
>> index a89da0ee25e2..b687ef88c4c4 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
>> @@ -33,19 +33,13 @@
>>   #ifdef PPC64_ELF_ABI_v2
>>   
>>   /* An address is simply the address of the function. */
>> -typedef unsigned long func_desc_t;
>> +typedef struct {
>> +	unsigned long addr;
>> +} func_desc_t;
> 
> I'm not quite following why this change is done. I guess it is so you
> can move this func_desc_t type into core code, but why do that? Is it
> just to avoid using the preprocessor?

I explained it in patch 7 but yes it probably also deserves some more 
explanation here as well.

That's right, it's to avoid having to spread #ifdefs everywhere.

> 
> On its own this patch looks okay.
> 
> Acked-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin at gmail.com>
> 


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list