[PATCH] powerpc/eeh: Delay slot presence check once driver is notified about the pci error.
Mahesh J Salgaonkar
mahesh at linux.ibm.com
Wed Nov 24 19:45:39 AEDT 2021
On 2021-11-24 10:14:30 Wed, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh at linux.ibm.com> writes:
> > When certain PHB HW failure causes phyp to recover PHB, it marks the PE
> > state as temporarily unavailable until recovery is complete. This also
> > triggers an EEH handler in Linux which needs to notify drivers, and perform
> > recovery. But before notifying the driver about the pci error it uses
> > get_adapter_state()->get-sesnor-state() operation of the hotplug_slot to
> > determine if the slot contains a device or not. if the slot is empty, the
> > recovery is skipped entirely.
> >
> > However on certain PHB failures, the rtas call get-sesnor-state() returns
> > extended busy error (9902) until PHB is recovered by phyp. Once PHB is
> > recovered, the get-sensor-state() returns success with correct presence
> > status. The rtas call interface rtas_get_sensor() loops over the rtas call
> > on extended delay return code (9902) until the return value is either
> > success (0) or error (-1). This causes the EEH handler to get stuck for ~6
> > seconds before it could notify that the pci error has been detected and
> > stop any active operations. Hence with running I/O traffic, during this 6
> > seconds, the network driver continues its operation and hits a timeout
> > (netdev watchdog). On timeouts, network driver go into ffdc capture mode
> > and reset path assuming the PCI device is in fatal condition. This causes
> > EEH recovery to fail and sometimes it leads to system hang or crash.
> >
> > ------------
> > [52732.244731] DEBUG: ibm_read_slot_reset_state2()
> > [52732.244762] DEBUG: ret = 0, rets[0]=5, rets[1]=1, rets[2]=4000, rets[3]=0x0
> > [52732.244798] DEBUG: in eeh_slot_presence_check
> > [52732.244804] DEBUG: error state check
> > [52732.244807] DEBUG: Is slot hotpluggable
> > [52732.244810] DEBUG: hotpluggable ops ?
> > [52732.244953] DEBUG: Calling ops->get_adapter_status
> > [52732.244958] DEBUG: calling rpaphp_get_sensor_state
> > [52736.564262] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [52736.564299] NETDEV WATCHDOG: enP64p1s0f3 (tg3): transmit queue 0 timed out
> > [52736.564324] WARNING: CPU: 1442 PID: 0 at net/sched/sch_generic.c:478 dev_watchdog+0x438/0x440
> > [...]
> > [52736.564505] NIP [c000000000c32368] dev_watchdog+0x438/0x440
> > [52736.564513] LR [c000000000c32364] dev_watchdog+0x434/0x440
> > ------------
> >
> > To fix this issue, delay the slot presence check after notifying the driver
> > about the pci error.
>
> How does this interact with the commit that put the slot presence check
> there in the first place:
>
> b104af5a7687 ("powerpc/eeh: Check slot presence state in eeh_handle_normal_event()")
>
>
> It seems like delaying the slot presence check will effectively revert
> that commit?
No it doesn't. We will still do a presence check before the recovery
process starts. This patch moves the check after notifying the driver to
stop active I/O operations. If a presence check finds the device isn't
present, we will skip the EEH recovery. However, on a surprise hotplug,
the user will see the EEH messages on the console before it finds there
is nothing to recover.
Current EEH behaviour:
EEH event -> eeh_handle_normal_event
/* Check for adapter status */
eeh_slot_presence_check()
if (!present)
bail out early
/* Report the error */
eeh_report_error() <- notify driver about error
driver->err_handler->error_detected()
/* Any active I/O will be stopped now */
/* Start the recovery process */
eeh_reset_device()
eeh_report_resume()
/* Recovery done */
With this patch:
EEH event -> eeh_handle_normal_event
/* Report the error */
eeh_report_error() <- notify driver about error
driver->err_handler->error_detected()
/* Any active I/O will be stopped now */
/* Check for adapter status */
eeh_slot_presence_check()
if (!present)
bail out early
/* Start the recovery process */
eeh_reset_device()
eeh_report_resume()
/* Recovery done */
Thanks,
-Mahesh.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list