[PATCH 04/11] powerpc/xive: Introduce xive_core_debugfs_create()

Cédric Le Goater clg at kaod.org
Fri Nov 19 02:22:32 AEDT 2021


On 11/18/21 10:21, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Cédric Le Goater <clg at kaod.org> writes:
> 
>> and fix some compile issues when !CONFIG_DEBUG_FS.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg at kaod.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
>>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
>> index 3d558cad1f19..b71cc1020296 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
> ...
>> @@ -1779,10 +1782,18 @@ static int xive_core_debug_show(struct seq_file *m, void *private)
>>   }
>>   DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(xive_core_debug);
>>   
>> +static void xive_core_debugfs_create(void)
>> +{
>> +	debugfs_create_file("xive", 0400, arch_debugfs_dir,
>> +			    NULL, &xive_core_debug_fops);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */
>> +
>>   int xive_core_debug_init(void)
>>   {
>> -	if (xive_enabled())
>> -		debugfs_create_file("xive", 0400, arch_debugfs_dir,
>> -				    NULL, &xive_core_debug_fops);
>> +	if (xive_enabled() && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS))
>> +		xive_core_debugfs_create();
>> +
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
> 
> For skiroot_defconfig this gives me:
> 
>    arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c: In function ‘xive_core_init’:
>    arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c:1676:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘xive_core_debugfs_create’; did you mean ‘xive_core_debug_init’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>     1676 |  xive_core_debugfs_create();
>          |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>          |  xive_core_debug_init
>    cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> 
> 
> We need an empty inline stub of xive_core_debugfs_create() for the
> CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n case.

I thought IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)) was protecting compile from
that issue. Do you want a v2 for the whole ?

Or, I can send a replacement for patch 4 only.

> I'm wondering though why do we have xive_core_debug_init() at all, why
> don't we just initialise the debugfs files in xive_core_init()?

I think I tried that and there was an ordering issue.

Thanks,

C.


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list