[PATCH v3 08/12] KVM: Propagate vcpu explicitly to mark_page_dirty_in_slot()
Paolo Bonzini
pbonzini at redhat.com
Thu Nov 18 23:04:07 AEDT 2021
On 11/17/21 22:09, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> {
>> - struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm_get_running_vcpu();
>> + struct kvm_vcpu *running_vcpu = kvm_get_running_vcpu();
>>
>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu && vcpu != running_vcpu);
>> WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu->kvm != kvm);
> Ah, that one needs to be changed to check running_vcpu instead. Or this
> needs to go first:
>
> I think I prefer making the vCPU a required argument. If anyone's going to
> pull a vCPU pointer out of their posterior, let the caller do it.
>
I understand that feeling, but still using the running vCPU is by far
the common case, and it's not worth adding a new function parameter to
all call sites.
What about using a separate function, possibly __-prefixed, for the case
where you have a very specific vCPU?
Paolo
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list