[PATCH v2 2/5] preempt/dynamic: Introduce preempt mode accessors
Christophe Leroy
christophe.leroy at csgroup.eu
Wed Nov 17 00:29:51 AEDT 2021
Le 10/11/2021 à 21:24, Valentin Schneider a écrit :
> CONFIG_PREEMPT{_NONE, _VOLUNTARY} designate either:
> o The build-time preemption model when !PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
> o The default boot-time preemption model when PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
>
> IOW, using those on PREEMPT_DYNAMIC kernels is meaningless - the actual
> model could have been set to something else by the "preempt=foo" cmdline
> parameter.
>
> Introduce a set of helpers to determine the actual preemption mode used by
> the live kernel.
>
> Suggested-by: Marco Elver <elver at google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider at arm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> kernel/sched/core.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 5f8db54226af..0640d5622496 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -2073,6 +2073,22 @@ static inline void cond_resched_rcu(void)
> #endif
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
> +
> +extern bool is_preempt_none(void);
> +extern bool is_preempt_voluntary(void);
> +extern bool is_preempt_full(void);
Those are trivial tests supposed to be used in fast pathes. They should
be static inlines in order to minimise the overhead.
> +
> +#else
> +
> +#define is_preempt_none() IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE)
> +#define is_preempt_voluntary() IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY)
> +#define is_preempt_full() IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT)
Would be better to use static inlines here as well instead of macros.
> +
> +#endif
> +
> +#define is_preempt_rt() IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)
> +
> /*
> * Does a critical section need to be broken due to another
> * task waiting?: (technically does not depend on CONFIG_PREEMPTION,
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 97047aa7b6c2..9db7f77e53c3 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -6638,6 +6638,17 @@ static void __init preempt_dynamic_init(void)
> }
> }
>
> +#define PREEMPT_MODE_ACCESSOR(mode) \
> + bool is_preempt_##mode(void) \
> + { \
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(preempt_dynamic_mode == preempt_dynamic_undefined); \
Not sure using WARN_ON is a good idea here, as it may be called very
early, see comment on powerpc patch.
> + return preempt_dynamic_mode == preempt_dynamic_##mode; \
> + }
I'm not sure that's worth a macro. You only have 3 accessors, 2 lines of
code each. Just define all 3 in plain text.
CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC is based on using strategies like static_calls in
order to minimise the overhead. For those accessors you should use the
same kind of approach and use things like jump_labels in order to not
redo the test at each time and minimise overhead as much as possible.
> +
> +PREEMPT_MODE_ACCESSOR(none)
> +PREEMPT_MODE_ACCESSOR(voluntary)
> +PREEMPT_MODE_ACCESSOR(full)
> +
> #else /* !CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC */
>
> static inline void preempt_dynamic_init(void) { }
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list