[PATCH v5 3/9] mm/mremap: Use pmd/pud_poplulate to update page table entries
Peter Xu
peterx at redhat.com
Thu May 20 12:18:43 AEST 2021
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:16:07AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:13:17AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> >> pmd/pud_populate is the right interface to be used to set the respective
> >> page table entries. Some architectures like ppc64 do assume that set_pmd/pud_at
> >> can only be used to set a hugepage PTE. Since we are not setting up a hugepage
> >> PTE here, use the pmd/pud_populate interface.
[1]
> Can you try this change?
>
> modified mm/mremap.c
> @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static bool move_normal_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long old_addr,
> pmd_clear(old_pmd);
>
> VM_BUG_ON(!pmd_none(*new_pmd));
> - pmd_populate(mm, new_pmd, (pgtable_t)pmd_page_vaddr(pmd));
> + pmd_populate(mm, new_pmd, pmd_pgtable(pmd));
>
> if (new_ptl != old_ptl)
> spin_unlock(new_ptl);
I reported this issue today somewhere else:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/YKVemB5DuSqLFmmz@t490s/
And came to this same line after the bisection.
This seems to work at least for my userfaultfd test on shmem, however I don't
fully understand the commit message [1] on: How do we guarantee we're not
moving a thp pte?
--
Peter Xu
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list