[PATCH v5 5/9] powerpc/mm/book3s64: Update tlb flush routines to take a page walk cache flush argument
Guenter Roeck
linux at roeck-us.net
Tue May 18 00:18:42 AEST 2021
On 5/17/21 6:55 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Guenter Roeck <linux at roeck-us.net> writes:
>
>> On 5/17/21 1:40 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>> On 5/15/21 10:05 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:13:19AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>>> extern void radix__local_flush_all_mm(struct mm_struct *mm);
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/tlbflush.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/tlbflush.h
>>>>> index 215973b4cb26..f9f8a3a264f7 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/tlbflush.h
>>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/tlbflush.h
>>>>> @@ -45,13 +45,30 @@ static inline void tlbiel_all_lpid(bool radix)
>>>>> hash__tlbiel_all(TLB_INVAL_SCOPE_LPID);
>>>>> }
>>>>> +static inline void flush_pmd_tlb_pwc_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>> ^^^^
>>>>> + unsigned long start,
>>>>> + unsigned long end,
>>>>> + bool flush_pwc)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + if (radix_enabled())
>>>>> + return radix__flush_pmd_tlb_range(vma, start, end, flush_pwc);
>>>>> + return hash__flush_tlb_range(vma, start, end);
>>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>>
>>>>> +}
>>>
>>> In this specific case we won't have build errors because,
>>>
>>> static inline void hash__flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>>> {
>>>
>>
>> Sorry, you completely lost me.
>>
>> Building parisc:allnoconfig ... failed
>> --------------
>> Error log:
>> In file included from arch/parisc/include/asm/cacheflush.h:7,
>> from include/linux/highmem.h:12,
>> from include/linux/pagemap.h:11,
>> from include/linux/ksm.h:13,
>> from mm/mremap.c:14:
>> mm/mremap.c: In function 'flush_pte_tlb_pwc_range':
>> arch/parisc/include/asm/tlbflush.h:20:2: error: 'return' with a value, in function returning void
>
> As replied here
> https://lore.kernel.org/mm-commits/8eedb441-a612-1ec8-8bf7-b40184de9f6f@linux.ibm.com/
>
> That was the generic header change in the patch. I was commenting about the
> ppc64 specific change causing build failures.
>
Ah, sorry. I wasn't aware that the following is valid C code
void f1()
{
return f2();
^^^^^^
}
as long as f2() is void as well. Confusing, but we live and learn.
Guenter
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list