[PATCH] cxl: don't manipulate the mm.mm_users field directly

Frederic Barrat fbarrat at linux.ibm.com
Thu Mar 11 18:46:25 AEDT 2021



On 10/03/2021 18:44, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> It is better to rely on the API provided by the MM layer instead of
> directly manipulating the mm_users field.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour at linux.ibm.com>
> ---


Thanks!
Acked-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat at linux.ibm.com>



>   drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c
> index 01153b74334a..60c829113299 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c
> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static struct mm_struct *get_mem_context(struct cxl_context *ctx)
>   	if (ctx->mm == NULL)
>   		return NULL;
>   
> -	if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&ctx->mm->mm_users))
> +	if (!mmget_not_zero(ctx->mm))
>   		return NULL;
>   
>   	return ctx->mm;
> 


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list