[PATCH] cxl: don't manipulate the mm.mm_users field directly
Frederic Barrat
fbarrat at linux.ibm.com
Thu Mar 11 18:46:25 AEDT 2021
On 10/03/2021 18:44, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> It is better to rely on the API provided by the MM layer instead of
> directly manipulating the mm_users field.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour at linux.ibm.com>
> ---
Thanks!
Acked-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat at linux.ibm.com>
> drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c
> index 01153b74334a..60c829113299 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c
> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static struct mm_struct *get_mem_context(struct cxl_context *ctx)
> if (ctx->mm == NULL)
> return NULL;
>
> - if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&ctx->mm->mm_users))
> + if (!mmget_not_zero(ctx->mm))
> return NULL;
>
> return ctx->mm;
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list