[PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/interrupt: Refactor prep_irq_for_user_exit()

Nicholas Piggin npiggin at gmail.com
Thu Jun 17 13:33:55 AEST 2021


Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of June 15, 2021 6:37 pm:
> 
> 
> Le 11/06/2021 à 04:30, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
>> Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of June 5, 2021 12:56 am:
>>> prep_irq_for_user_exit() is a superset of
>>> prep_irq_for_kernel_enabled_exit().
>>>
>>> Refactor it.
>> 
>> I like the refactoring, but now prep_irq_for_user_exit() is calling
>> prep_irq_for_kernel_enabled_exit(), which seems like the wrong naming.
>> 
>> You could re-name prep_irq_for_kernel_enabled_exit() to
>> prep_irq_for_enabled_exit() maybe? Or it could be
>> __prep_irq_for_enabled_exit() then prep_irq_for_kernel_enabled_exit()
>> and prep_irq_for_user_exit() would both call it.
> 
> I renamed it prep_irq_for_enabled_exit().
> 
> And I realised that after patch 4, prep_irq_for_enabled_exit() has become a trivial function used 
> only once.
> 
> So I swapped patches 1/2 with patches 3/4 and added a 5th one to squash prep_irq_for_enabled_exit() 
> into its caller.
> 
> You didn't have any comment on patch 4 (that is now patch 2) ?

I think it's okay, just trying to hunt down some apparent big-endian bug 
with my series. I can't see any problems with yours though, thanks for
rebasing them, I'll take a better look when I can.

Thanks,
Nick


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list