[RFC PATCH 8/8] powerpc/papr_scm: Use FORM2 associativity details
David Gibson
david at gibson.dropbear.id.au
Tue Jun 15 16:34:56 AEST 2021
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 11:27:50AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> David Gibson <david at gibson.dropbear.id.au> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 10:10:03PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> >> FORM2 introduce a concept of secondary domain which is identical to the
> >> conceept of FORM1 primary domain. Use secondary domain as the numa node
> >> when using persistent memory device. For DAX kmem use the logical domain
> >> id introduced in FORM2. This new numa node
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar at linux.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >> arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c | 26 +++++++++++++--------
> >> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries.h | 1 +
> >> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> >> index 86cd2af014f7..b9ac6d02e944 100644
> >> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> >> @@ -265,6 +265,34 @@ static int associativity_to_nid(const __be32 *associativity)
> >> return nid;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +int get_primary_and_secondary_domain(struct device_node *node, int *primary, int *secondary)
> >> +{
> >> + int secondary_index;
> >> + const __be32 *associativity;
> >> +
> >> + if (!numa_enabled) {
> >> + *primary = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> >> + *secondary = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> >> + return 0;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + associativity = of_get_associativity(node);
> >> + if (!associativity)
> >> + return -ENODEV;
> >> +
> >> + if (of_read_number(associativity, 1) >= primary_domain_index) {
> >> + *primary = of_read_number(&associativity[primary_domain_index], 1);
> >> + secondary_index = of_read_number(&distance_ref_points[1], 1);
> >
> > Secondary ID is always the second reference point, but primary depends
> > on the length of resources? That seems very weird.
>
> primary_domain_index is distance_ref_point[0]. With Form2 we would find
> both primary and secondary domain ID same for all resources other than
> persistent memory device. The usage w.r.t. persistent memory is
> explained in patch 7.
Right, I misunderstood
>
> With Form2 the primary domainID and secondary domainID are used to identify the NUMA nodes
> the kernel should use when using persistent memory devices.
This seems kind of bogus. With Form1, the primary/secondary ID are a
sort of heirarchy of distance (things with same primary ID are very
close, things with same secondary are kinda-close, etc.). With Form2,
it's referring to their effective node for different purposes.
Using the same terms for different meanings seems unnecessarily
confusing.
> Persistent memory devices
> can also be used as regular memory using DAX KMEM driver and primary domainID indicates
> the numa node number OS should use when using these devices as regular memory. Secondary
> domainID is the numa node number that should be used when using this device as
> persistent memory.
It's weird to me that you'd want to consider them in different nodes
for those different purposes.
> In the later case, we are interested in the locality of the
> device to an established numa node. In the above example, if the last row represents a
> persistent memory device/resource, NUMA node number 40 will be used when using the device
> as regular memory and NUMA node number 0 will be the device numa node when using it as
> a persistent memory device.
I don't really get what you mean by "locality of the device to an
established numa node". Or at least how that's different from
anything else we're handling here.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20210615/d25abfab/attachment.sig>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list