[PATCH v5 1/6] powerpc/pseries: rename min_common_depth to primary_domain_index
Aneesh Kumar K.V
aneesh.kumar at linux.ibm.com
Thu Jul 22 15:17:49 AEST 2021
On 7/22/21 8:06 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 11:59:15AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 08:41:12PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>> No functional change in this patch.
>>
>> The new name does not match how you describe "primary domain index" in
>> the documentation from patch 6/6. There it comes from the values in
>> associativity-reference-points, but here it simply comes from the
>> lengths of all the associativity properties.
>
> No, sorry, I misread this code... misled by the old name, so it's a
> good thing you're changing it.
>
> But.. I'm still not sure the new name is accurate, either...
>
> [snip]
>>> if (form1_affinity) {
>>> - depth = of_read_number(distance_ref_points, 1);
>>> + index = of_read_number(distance_ref_points, 1);
>
> AFACIT distance_ref_points hasn't been altered from the
> of_get_property() at this point, so isn't this setting depth / index
> to the number of entries in ref-points, rather than the value of the
> first entry (which is what primary domain index is supposed to be).
>
ibm,associativity-reference-points property format is as below.
# lsprop ibm,associativity-reference-points
ibm,associativity-reference-points
00000004 00000002
it doesn't have the number of elements as the first item.
For FORM1 1 element is the NUMA boundary index/primary_domain_index
For FORM0 2 element is the NUMA boundary index/primary_domain_index.
>>> } else {
>>> if (distance_ref_points_depth < 2) {
>>> printk(KERN_WARNING "NUMA: "
>>> @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int __init find_min_common_depth(void)
>>> goto err;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - depth = of_read_number(&distance_ref_points[1], 1);
>>> + index = of_read_number(&distance_ref_points[1], 1);
>>> }
>>>
>>> /*
>>> @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static int __init find_min_common_depth(void)
>>> }
>>>
>>> of_node_put(root);
>>> - return depth;
>>> + return index;
>>>
>>> err:
>>> of_node_put(root);
>>> @@ -437,16 +437,16 @@ int of_drconf_to_nid_single(struct drmem_lmb *lmb)
>>> int nid = default_nid;
>>> int rc, index;
>>>
>>> - if ((min_common_depth < 0) || !numa_enabled)
>>> + if ((primary_domain_index < 0) || !numa_enabled)
>>> return default_nid;
>>>
>>> rc = of_get_assoc_arrays(&aa);
>>> if (rc)
>>> return default_nid;
>>>
>>> - if (min_common_depth <= aa.array_sz &&
>>> + if (primary_domain_index <= aa.array_sz &&
>>> !(lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_AI_INVALID) && lmb->aa_index < aa.n_arrays) {
>>> - index = lmb->aa_index * aa.array_sz + min_common_depth - 1;
>>> + index = lmb->aa_index * aa.array_sz + primary_domain_index - 1;
>>> nid = of_read_number(&aa.arrays[index], 1);
>>>
>>> if (nid == 0xffff || nid >= nr_node_ids)
>>> @@ -708,18 +708,18 @@ static int __init parse_numa_properties(void)
>>> return -1;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - min_common_depth = find_min_common_depth();
>>> + primary_domain_index = find_primary_domain_index();
>>>
>>> - if (min_common_depth < 0) {
>>> + if (primary_domain_index < 0) {
>>> /*
>>> - * if we fail to parse min_common_depth from device tree
>>> + * if we fail to parse primary_domain_index from device tree
>>> * mark the numa disabled, boot with numa disabled.
>>> */
>>> numa_enabled = false;
>>> - return min_common_depth;
>>> + return primary_domain_index;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - dbg("NUMA associativity depth for CPU/Memory: %d\n", min_common_depth);
>>> + dbg("NUMA associativity depth for CPU/Memory: %d\n", primary_domain_index);
>>>
>>> /*
>>> * Even though we connect cpus to numa domains later in SMP
>>> @@ -919,14 +919,14 @@ static void __init find_possible_nodes(void)
>>> goto out;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - max_nodes = of_read_number(&domains[min_common_depth], 1);
>>> + max_nodes = of_read_number(&domains[primary_domain_index], 1);
>>> for (i = 0; i < max_nodes; i++) {
>>> if (!node_possible(i))
>>> node_set(i, node_possible_map);
>>> }
>>>
>>> prop_length /= sizeof(int);
>>> - if (prop_length > min_common_depth + 2)
>>> + if (prop_length > primary_domain_index + 2)
>>> coregroup_enabled = 1;
>>>
>>> out:
>>> @@ -1259,7 +1259,7 @@ int cpu_to_coregroup_id(int cpu)
>>> goto out;
>>>
>>> index = of_read_number(associativity, 1);
>>> - if (index > min_common_depth + 1)
>>> + if (index > primary_domain_index + 1)
>>> return of_read_number(&associativity[index - 1], 1);
>>>
>>> out:
>>
>
>
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list