[PATCH V3 1/1] powerpc/perf: Fix PMU callbacks to clear pending PMI before resetting an overflown PMC
Nicholas Piggin
npiggin at gmail.com
Mon Jul 12 12:37:25 AEST 2021
Excerpts from Athira Rajeev's message of July 11, 2021 1:58 am:
> Running perf fuzzer showed below in dmesg logs:
> "Can't find PMC that caused IRQ"
>
> This means a PMU exception happened, but none of the PMC's (Performance
> Monitor Counter) were found to be overflown. There are some corner cases
> that clears the PMCs after PMI gets masked. In such cases, the perf
> interrupt handler will not find the active PMC values that had caused
> the overflow and thus leads to this message while replaying.
>
> Case 1: PMU Interrupt happens during replay of other interrupts and
> counter values gets cleared by PMU callbacks before replay:
>
> During replay of interrupts like timer, __do_irq and doorbell exception, we
> conditionally enable interrupts via may_hard_irq_enable(). This could
> potentially create a window to generate a PMI. Since irq soft mask is set
> to ALL_DISABLED, the PMI will get masked here. We could get IPIs run before
> perf interrupt is replayed and the PMU events could deleted or stopped.
> This will change the PMU SPR values and resets the counters. Snippet of
> ftrace log showing PMU callbacks invoked in "__do_irq":
>
> <idle>-0 [051] dns. 132025441306354: __do_irq <-call_do_irq
> <idle>-0 [051] dns. 132025441306430: irq_enter <-__do_irq
> <idle>-0 [051] dns. 132025441306503: irq_enter_rcu <-__do_irq
> <idle>-0 [051] dnH. 132025441306599: xive_get_irq <-__do_irq
> <<>>
> <idle>-0 [051] dnH. 132025441307770: generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt <-smp_ipi_demux_relaxed
> <idle>-0 [051] dnH. 132025441307839: flush_smp_call_function_queue <-smp_ipi_demux_relaxed
> <idle>-0 [051] dnH. 132025441308057: _raw_spin_lock <-event_function
> <idle>-0 [051] dnH. 132025441308206: power_pmu_disable <-perf_pmu_disable
> <idle>-0 [051] dnH. 132025441308337: power_pmu_del <-event_sched_out
> <idle>-0 [051] dnH. 132025441308407: power_pmu_read <-power_pmu_del
> <idle>-0 [051] dnH. 132025441308477: read_pmc <-power_pmu_read
> <idle>-0 [051] dnH. 132025441308590: isa207_disable_pmc <-power_pmu_del
> <idle>-0 [051] dnH. 132025441308663: write_pmc <-power_pmu_del
> <idle>-0 [051] dnH. 132025441308787: power_pmu_event_idx <-perf_event_update_userpage
> <idle>-0 [051] dnH. 132025441308859: rcu_read_unlock_strict <-perf_event_update_userpage
> <idle>-0 [051] dnH. 132025441308975: power_pmu_enable <-perf_pmu_enable
> <<>>
> <idle>-0 [051] dnH. 132025441311108: irq_exit <-__do_irq
> <idle>-0 [051] dns. 132025441311319: performance_monitor_exception <-replay_soft_interrupts
>
> Case 2: PMI's masked during local_* operations, example local_add.
> If the local_add operation happens within a local_irq_save, replay of
> PMI will be during local_irq_restore. Similar to case 1, this could
> also create a window before replay where PMU events gets deleted or
> stopped.
>
> Patch adds a fix to update the PMU callback function 'power_pmu_disable' to
> check for pending perf interrupt. If there is an overflown PMC and pending
> perf interrupt indicated in Paca, clear the PMI bit in paca to drop that
> sample. Clearing of PMI bit is done in 'power_pmu_disable' since disable is
> invoked before any event gets deleted/stopped. With this fix, if there are
> more than one event running in the PMU, there is a chance that we clear the
> PMI bit for the event which is not getting deleted/stopped. The other
> events may still remain active. Hence to make sure we don't drop valid
> sample in such cases, another check is added in power_pmu_enable. This
> checks if there is an overflown PMC found among the active events and if
> so enable back the PMI bit. Two new helper functions are introduced to
> clear/set the PMI, ie 'clear_pmi_irq_pending' and 'set_pmi_irq_pending'.
>
> Also there are corner cases which results in performance monitor interrupts
> getting triggered during power_pmu_disable. This happens since PMXE bit is
> not cleared along with disabling of other MMCR0 bits in the pmu_disable.
> Such PMI's could leave the PMU running and could trigger PMI again which
> will set MMCR0 PMAO bit. This could lead to spurious interrupts in some
> corner cases. Example, a timer after power_pmu_del which will re-enable
> interrupts and triggers a PMI again since PMAO bit is still set. But fails
> to find valid overflow since PMC get cleared in power_pmu_del. Patch
> fixes this by disabling PMXE along with disabling of other MMCR0 bits
> in power_pmu_disable.
>
> We can't just replay PMI any time. Hence this approach is preferred rather
> than replaying PMI before resetting overflown PMC. Patch also documents
> core-book3s on a race condition which can trigger these PMC messages during
> idle path in PowerNV.
>
> Fixes: f442d004806e ("powerpc/64s: Add support to mask perf interrupts and replay them")
> Reported-by: Nageswara R Sastry <nasastry at in.ibm.com>
> Suggested-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin at gmail.com>
> Suggested-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy at linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> index 21cc571..0a067bb 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> @@ -224,6 +224,34 @@ static inline bool arch_irqs_disabled(void)
> return arch_irqs_disabled_flags(arch_local_save_flags());
> }
>
> +static inline void set_pmi_irq_pending(void)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Invoked currently from PMU callback functions
> + * to set PMI bit in Paca. This has to be called
> + * with irq's disabled ( via hard_irq_disable ).
> + */
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_IRQ_SOFT_MASK_DEBUG))
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(mfmsr() & MSR_EE);
> + get_paca()->irq_happened |= PACA_IRQ_PMI;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void clear_pmi_irq_pending(void)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Some corner cases could clear the PMU counter overflow
> + * while a masked PMI is pending. One of such case is
> + * when a PMI happens during interrupt replay and perf
> + * counter values gets cleared by PMU callbacks before
> + * replay. So the pending PMI must be cleared here.
> + */
> + if (get_paca()->irq_happened & PACA_IRQ_PMI) {
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_IRQ_SOFT_MASK_DEBUG))
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(mfmsr() & MSR_EE);
> + get_paca()->irq_happened &= ~PACA_IRQ_PMI;
I think you could just make this match set_pmi_irq_pending, that
is, always do the debug test, and remove the branch entirely.
> + }
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S
> /*
> * To support disabling and enabling of irq with PMI, set of
> @@ -408,6 +436,9 @@ static inline void do_hard_irq_enable(void)
> BUILD_BUG();
> }
>
> +static inline void clear_pmi_irq_pending(void) { }
> +static inline void set_pmi_irq_pending(void) { }
> +
> static inline void irq_soft_mask_regs_set_state(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long val)
> {
> }
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> index bb0ee71..17463b2 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> @@ -848,6 +848,19 @@ static void write_pmc(int idx, unsigned long val)
> }
> }
>
> +static int any_pmc_overflown(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
> +{
> + int i, idx;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < cpuhw->n_events; i++) {
> + idx = cpuhw->event[i]->hw.idx;
> + if ((idx) && ((int)read_pmc(idx) < 0))
> + return idx;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /* Called from sysrq_handle_showregs() */
> void perf_event_print_debug(void)
> {
> @@ -1276,7 +1289,7 @@ static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> val = mmcr0 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
> val |= MMCR0_FC;
> val &= ~(MMCR0_EBE | MMCR0_BHRBA | MMCR0_PMCC | MMCR0_PMAO |
> - MMCR0_FC56);
> + MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FC56);
Maybe a comment to say why you clear PMXE?
> /* Set mmcr0 PMCCEXT for p10 */
> if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_31)
> val |= MMCR0_PMCCEXT;
> @@ -1290,6 +1303,16 @@ static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> mb();
> isync();
>
> + /*
> + * If any of PMC corresponding to the active PMU
> + * events is overflown, check if there is any pending
> + * perf interrupt set in paca. If so, disable the interrupt
> + * by clearing the paca bit for PMI since we are disabling
> + * the PMU now.
> + */
> + if (any_pmc_overflown(cpuhw))
> + clear_pmi_irq_pending();
Is there a need for the any_pmc_overflown() check here? Could you just
clear unconditionally? Would it be a bug if no pmc was overflown but we
had a PMI pending?
> +
> val = mmcra = cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra;
>
> /*
> @@ -1381,6 +1404,15 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> * (possibly updated for removal of events).
> */
> if (!cpuhw->n_added) {
> + /*
> + * If there is any active event with an overflown PMC
> + * value, Set back PACA_IRQ_PMI which would have got
> + * cleared in power_pmu_disable.
> + */
> + hard_irq_disable();
> + if (any_pmc_overflown(cpuhw))
> + set_pmi_irq_pending();
> +
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
> if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_31)
> @@ -2336,6 +2368,12 @@ static void __perf_event_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
> break;
> }
> }
> + /*
> + * Check if PACA_IRQ_PMI is set any chance
> + * by set_pmi_irq_pending() when PMU was enabled
> + * after accounting for interrupts.
"Clear PACA_IRQ_PMI in case it was set by..." ?
Aside from those minor things,
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin at gmail.com>
Thanks,
Nick
> + */
> + clear_pmi_irq_pending();
> if (!active)
> /* reset non active counters that have overflowed */
> write_pmc(i + 1, 0);
> @@ -2355,6 +2393,15 @@ static void __perf_event_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
> }
> }
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * During system wide profling or while specific CPU
> + * is monitored for an event, some corner cases could
> + * cause PMC to overflow in idle path. This will trigger
> + * a PMI after waking up from idle. Since counter values
> + * are _not_ saved/restored in idle path, can lead to
> + * below "Can't find PMC" message.
> + */
> if (unlikely(!found) && !arch_irq_disabled_regs(regs))
> printk_ratelimited(KERN_WARNING "Can't find PMC that caused IRQ\n");
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list