[PATCH v15 09/10] arm64: Call kmalloc() to allocate DTB buffer
Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
nramas at linux.microsoft.com
Thu Jan 28 15:00:34 AEDT 2021
On 1/27/21 7:52 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>
> Will Deacon <will at kernel.org> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 09:59:38AM -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
>>> On 1/27/21 8:52 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Will,
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 09:30:16AM -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
>>>>> create_dtb() function allocates kernel virtual memory for
>>>>> the device tree blob (DTB). This is not consistent with other
>>>>> architectures, such as powerpc, which calls kmalloc() for allocating
>>>>> memory for the DTB.
>>>>>
>>>>> Call kmalloc() to allocate memory for the DTB, and kfree() to free
>>>>> the allocated memory.
>>>>>
>>>>> Co-developed-by: Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva at linux.microsoft.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva at linux.microsoft.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas at linux.microsoft.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c | 12 +++++++-----
>>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
>>>>> index 7de9c47dee7c..51c40143d6fa 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
>>>>> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ const struct kexec_file_ops * const kexec_file_loaders[] = {
>>>>> int arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image)
>>>>> {
>>>>> - vfree(image->arch.dtb);
>>>>> + kfree(image->arch.dtb);
>>>>> image->arch.dtb = NULL;
>>>>> vfree(image->arch.elf_headers);
>>>>> @@ -59,19 +59,21 @@ static int create_dtb(struct kimage *image,
>>>>> + cmdline_len + DTB_EXTRA_SPACE;
>>>>> for (;;) {
>>>>> - buf = vmalloc(buf_size);
>>>>> + buf = kmalloc(buf_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>
>>>> Is there a functional need for this patch? I build the 'dtbs' target just
>>>> now and sdm845-db845c.dtb is approaching 100K, which feels quite large
>>>> for kmalloc().
>>>
>>> Changing the allocation from vmalloc() to kmalloc() would help us further
>>> consolidate the DTB setup code for powerpc and arm64.
>>
>> Ok, but at the risk of allocation failure. Can powerpc use vmalloc()
>> instead?
>
> I believe this patch stems from this suggestion by Rob Herring:
>
>> This could be taken a step further and do the allocation of the new
>> FDT. The difference is arm64 uses vmalloc and powerpc uses kmalloc. The
>> arm64 version also retries with a bigger allocation. That seems
>> unnecessary.
>
> in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20201211221006.1052453-3-robh@kernel.org/
>
> The problem is that this patch implements only part of the suggestion,
> which isn't useful in itself. So the patch series should either drop
> this patch or consolidate the FDT allocation between the arches.
>
> I just tested on powernv and pseries platforms and powerpc can use
> vmalloc for the FDT buffer.
>
Thanks for verifying on powerpc platform Thiago.
I'll update the patch to do the following:
=> Use vmalloc for FDT buffer allocation on powerpc
=> Keep vmalloc for arm64, but remove the retry on allocation.
=> Also, there was a memory leak of FDT buffer in the error code path on
arm64, which I'll fix as well.
Did I miss anything?
thanks,
-lakshmi
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list