[PATCH v11 01/13] mm/vmalloc: fix HUGE_VMAP regression by enabling huge pages in vmalloc_to_page
Ding Tianhong
dingtianhong at huawei.com
Thu Jan 28 14:13:20 AEDT 2021
On 2021/1/26 12:44, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> vmalloc_to_page returns NULL for addresses mapped by larger pages[*].
> Whether or not a vmap is huge depends on the architecture details,
> alignments, boot options, etc., which the caller can not be expected
> to know. Therefore HUGE_VMAP is a regression for vmalloc_to_page.
>
> This change teaches vmalloc_to_page about larger pages, and returns
> the struct page that corresponds to the offset within the large page.
> This makes the API agnostic to mapping implementation details.
>
> [*] As explained by commit 029c54b095995 ("mm/vmalloc.c: huge-vmap:
> fail gracefully on unexpected huge vmap mappings")
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin at gmail.com>
> ---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index e6f352bf0498..62372f9e0167 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> #include <linux/rbtree_augmented.h>
> #include <linux/overflow.h>
> -
> +#include <linux/pgtable.h>
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
> #include <asm/shmparam.h>
> @@ -343,7 +343,9 @@ int is_vmalloc_or_module_addr(const void *x)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Walk a vmap address to the struct page it maps.
> + * Walk a vmap address to the struct page it maps. Huge vmap mappings will
> + * return the tail page that corresponds to the base page address, which
> + * matches small vmap mappings.
> */
> struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *vmalloc_addr)
> {
> @@ -363,25 +365,33 @@ struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *vmalloc_addr)
>
> if (pgd_none(*pgd))
> return NULL;
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(pgd_leaf(*pgd)))
> + return NULL; /* XXX: no allowance for huge pgd */
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(pgd_bad(*pgd)))
> + return NULL;
> +
> p4d = p4d_offset(pgd, addr);
> if (p4d_none(*p4d))
> return NULL;
> - pud = pud_offset(p4d, addr);
> + if (p4d_leaf(*p4d))
> + return p4d_page(*p4d) + ((addr & ~P4D_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(p4d_bad(*p4d)))
> + return NULL;
>
> - /*
> - * Don't dereference bad PUD or PMD (below) entries. This will also
> - * identify huge mappings, which we may encounter on architectures
> - * that define CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP=y. Such regions will be
> - * identified as vmalloc addresses by is_vmalloc_addr(), but are
> - * not [unambiguously] associated with a struct page, so there is
> - * no correct value to return for them.
> - */
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(pud_bad(*pud));
> - if (pud_none(*pud) || pud_bad(*pud))
> + pud = pud_offset(p4d, addr);
> + if (pud_none(*pud))
> + return NULL;
> + if (pud_leaf(*pud))
> + return pud_page(*pud) + ((addr & ~PUD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
Hi Nicho:
/builds/1mzfdQzleCy69KZFb5qHNSEgabZ/mm/vmalloc.c: In function 'vmalloc_to_page':
/builds/1mzfdQzleCy69KZFb5qHNSEgabZ/include/asm-generic/pgtable-nop4d-hack.h:48:27: error: implicit declaration of function 'pud_page'; did you mean 'put_page'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
48 | #define pgd_page(pgd) (pud_page((pud_t){ pgd }))
| ^~~~~~~~
the pug_page is not defined for aarch32 when enabling 2-level page config, it break the system building.
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(pud_bad(*pud)))
> return NULL;
> +
> pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(pmd_bad(*pmd));
> - if (pmd_none(*pmd) || pmd_bad(*pmd))
> + if (pmd_none(*pmd))
> + return NULL;
> + if (pmd_leaf(*pmd))
> + return pmd_page(*pmd) + ((addr & ~PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(pmd_bad(*pmd)))
> return NULL;
>
> ptep = pte_offset_map(pmd, addr);
> @@ -389,6 +399,7 @@ struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *vmalloc_addr)
> if (pte_present(pte))
> page = pte_page(pte);
> pte_unmap(ptep);
> +
> return page;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_to_page);
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list