[PATCH 1/5] crypto: sha256 - remove duplicate generic hash init function
Tianjia Zhang
tianjia.zhang at linux.alibaba.com
Thu Dec 23 13:59:18 AEDT 2021
Hi Julian,
On 12/23/21 6:35 AM, Julian Calaby wrote:
> Hi Tianjia,
>
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 8:25 PM Tianjia Zhang
> <tianjia.zhang at linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>
>> crypto_sha256_init() and sha256_base_init() are the same repeated
>> implementations, remove the crypto_sha256_init() in generic
>> implementation, sha224 is the same process.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang at linux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> crypto/sha256_generic.c | 16 ++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/crypto/sha256_generic.c b/crypto/sha256_generic.c
>> index 3b377197236e..bf147b01e313 100644
>> --- a/crypto/sha256_generic.c
>> +++ b/crypto/sha256_generic.c
>> @@ -72,7 +60,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(crypto_sha256_finup);
>>
>> static struct shash_alg sha256_algs[2] = { {
>> .digestsize = SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE,
>> - .init = crypto_sha256_init,
>> + .init = sha256_base_init,
>> .update = crypto_sha256_update,
>> .final = crypto_sha256_final,
>> .finup = crypto_sha256_finup,
>> @@ -86,7 +74,7 @@ static struct shash_alg sha256_algs[2] = { {
>> }
>> }, {
>> .digestsize = SHA224_DIGEST_SIZE,
>> - .init = crypto_sha224_init,
>> + .init = sha224_base_init,
>> .update = crypto_sha256_update,
>> .final = crypto_sha256_final,
>> .finup = crypto_sha256_finup,
>
> Aren't these two functions defined as static inline functions? It
> appears that these crypto_ wrappers were added so there's "actual"
> referenceable functions for these structs.
>
> Did this actually compile?
>
> Thanks,
>
Judging from the compilation results, there is really no difference, but
the modification made by this patch is still necessary, because
crypto_sha256_init() wrapper and sha256_base_init() are two completely
duplicate functions.
Best regards,
Tianjia
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list