[PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc/bug: Provide better flexibility to WARN_ON/__WARN_FLAGS() with asm goto
Michael Ellerman
mpe at ellerman.id.au
Thu Aug 26 13:21:39 AEST 2021
Nathan Chancellor <nathan at kernel.org> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 04:38:10PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> Using asm goto in __WARN_FLAGS() and WARN_ON() allows more
>> flexibility to GCC.
...
>
> This patch as commit 1e688dd2a3d6 ("powerpc/bug: Provide better
> flexibility to WARN_ON/__WARN_FLAGS() with asm goto") cause a WARN_ON in
> klist_add_tail to trigger over and over on boot when compiling with
> clang:
>
> [ 2.177416][ T1] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at lib/klist.c:62 .klist_add_tail+0x3c/0x110
> [ 2.177456][ T1] Modules linked in:
> [ 2.177481][ T1] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W 5.14.0-rc7-next-20210825 #1
> [ 2.177520][ T1] NIP: c0000000007ff81c LR: c00000000090a038 CTR: 0000000000000000
> [ 2.177557][ T1] REGS: c0000000073c32a0 TRAP: 0700 Tainted: G W (5.14.0-rc7-next-20210825)
> [ 2.177593][ T1] MSR: 8000000002029032 <SF,VEC,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI> CR: 22000a40 XER: 00000000
> [ 2.177667][ T1] CFAR: c00000000090a034 IRQMASK: 0
> [ 2.177667][ T1] GPR00: c00000000090a038 c0000000073c3540 c000000001be3200 0000000000000001
> [ 2.177667][ T1] GPR04: c0000000072d65c0 0000000000000000 c0000000091ba798 c0000000091bb0a0
> [ 2.177667][ T1] GPR08: 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 c000000008581918 fffffffffffffc00
> [ 2.177667][ T1] GPR12: 0000000044000240 c000000001dd0000 c000000000012300 0000000000000000
> [ 2.177667][ T1] GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> [ 2.177667][ T1] GPR20: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> [ 2.177667][ T1] GPR24: 0000000000000000 c0000000017e3200 0000000000000000 c000000001a0e778
> [ 2.177667][ T1] GPR28: c0000000072d65b0 c0000000072d65a8 c000000007de72c8 c0000000073c35d0
> [ 2.178019][ T1] NIP [c0000000007ff81c] .klist_add_tail+0x3c/0x110
> [ 2.178058][ T1] LR [c00000000090a038] .bus_add_driver+0x148/0x290
> [ 2.178088][ T1] Call Trace:
> [ 2.178105][ T1] [c0000000073c3540] [c0000000073c35d0] 0xc0000000073c35d0 (unreliable)
> [ 2.178150][ T1] [c0000000073c35d0] [c00000000090a038] .bus_add_driver+0x148/0x290
> [ 2.178190][ T1] [c0000000073c3670] [c00000000090fae8] .driver_register+0xb8/0x190
> [ 2.178234][ T1] [c0000000073c3700] [c000000000be55c0] .__hid_register_driver+0x70/0xd0
> [ 2.178275][ T1] [c0000000073c37a0] [c00000000116955c] .redragon_driver_init+0x34/0x58
> [ 2.178314][ T1] [c0000000073c3820] [c000000000011ae0] .do_one_initcall+0x130/0x3b0
> [ 2.178357][ T1] [c0000000073c3bb0] [c0000000011065e0] .do_initcall_level+0xd8/0x188
> [ 2.178403][ T1] [c0000000073c3c50] [c0000000011064a8] .do_initcalls+0x7c/0xdc
> [ 2.178445][ T1] [c0000000073c3ce0] [c000000001106238] .kernel_init_freeable+0x178/0x21c
> [ 2.178491][ T1] [c0000000073c3d90] [c000000000012334] .kernel_init+0x34/0x220
> [ 2.178530][ T1] [c0000000073c3e10] [c00000000000cf50] .ret_from_kernel_thread+0x58/0x60
> [ 2.178569][ T1] Instruction dump:
> [ 2.178592][ T1] fba10078 7c7d1b78 38600001 fb810070 3b9d0008 fbc10080 7c9e2378 389d0018
> [ 2.178662][ T1] fb9d0008 fb9d0010 90640000 fbdd0000 <0b1e0000> e87e0018 28230000 41820024
> [ 2.178728][ T1] ---[ end trace 52ed3431f58f1847 ]---
>
> Is this a bug with clang or is there something wrong with the patch? The
> vmlinux image is available at [1] if you want to inspect it and our QEMU
> command and the warning at boot can be viewed at [2]. If there is any
> other information I can provide, please let me know.
>
> [1] https://builds.tuxbuild.com/1xDcmp3Tvno0TTGxDVPedRKIKM2/
> [2] https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration2/commit/cee159b66a58eb57fa2359e7888074b9da24126c/checks/3422232736/logs
Thanks.
This is the generated assembly:
c0000000007ff600 <.klist_add_tail>:
c0000000007ff600: 7c 08 02 a6 mflr r0
c0000000007ff604: f8 01 00 10 std r0,16(r1)
c0000000007ff608: f8 21 ff 71 stdu r1,-144(r1) ^ prolog
c0000000007ff60c: fb a1 00 78 std r29,120(r1) save r29 to stack
c0000000007ff610: 7c 7d 1b 78 mr r29,r3 r29 = struct klist_node *n
c0000000007ff614: 38 60 00 01 li r3,1 r3 = 1
c0000000007ff618: fb 81 00 70 std r28,112(r1) save r28 to stack
c0000000007ff61c: 3b 9d 00 08 addi r28,r29,8 r28 = &n->n_node
c0000000007ff620: fb c1 00 80 std r30,128(r1) save r30 to stack
c0000000007ff624: 7c 9e 23 78 mr r30,r4 r30 = struct klist *k
c0000000007ff628: 38 9d 00 18 addi r4,r29,24 r4 = &n->n_ref
c0000000007ff62c: fb 9d 00 08 std r28,8(r29) n->n_node.next = &n->n_node INIT_LIST_HEAD
c0000000007ff630: fb 9d 00 10 std r28,16(r29) n->n_node.prev = &n->n_node
c0000000007ff634: 90 64 00 00 stw r3,0(r4) kref_init(&n->n_ref)
c0000000007ff638: fb dd 00 00 std r30,0(r29) n->n_klist = k
c0000000007ff63c: 0b 1e 00 00 tdnei r30,0 trap if r30 (k) is not zero
From:
static void knode_set_klist(struct klist_node *knode, struct klist *klist)
{
knode->n_klist = klist;
/* no knode deserves to start its life dead */
WARN_ON(knode_dead(knode));
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
}
Which expands to:
static void knode_set_klist(struct klist_node *knode, struct klist *klist)
{
knode->n_klist = klist;
({
bool __ret_warn_on = false;
do {
...
} else {
__label__ __label_warn_on;
do {
asm goto(
"1: "
"tdnei"
"
" " % 4,
0 " "\n " ".section __ex_table,\"a\";"
" "
".balign 4;"
" "
".long (1b) - . ;"
" "
".long (%l[__label_warn_on]) - . ;"
" "
".previous"
" "
".section __bug_table,\"aw\"\n"
"2:\t.4byte 1b - 2b, %0 - 2b\n"
"\t.short %1, %2\n"
".org 2b+%3\n"
".previous\n"
:
: "i"("lib/klist.c"), "i"(62),
"i"((1 << 0) | ((9) << 8)),
"i"(sizeof(struct bug_entry)),
"r"(knode_dead(knode))
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
:
: __label_warn_on);
asm("");
} while (0);
break;
__label_warn_on:
__ret_warn_on = true;
}
} while (0);
__builtin_expect(!!(__ret_warn_on), 0);
});
}
And knode_dead is:
#define KNODE_DEAD 1LU
static bool knode_dead(struct klist_node *knode)
{
return (unsigned long)knode->n_klist & KNODE_DEAD;
}
So it's meant to warn if (n_klist & KNODE_DEAD) is not equal to zero.
But in the asm:
c0000000007ff600 <.klist_add_tail>:
...
c0000000007ff624: 7c 9e 23 78 mr r30,r4 r30 = struct klist *k
...
c0000000007ff638: fb dd 00 00 std r30,0(r29) n->n_klist = k
c0000000007ff63c: 0b 1e 00 00 tdnei r30,0 trap if r30 (k) is not zero
It's just warning if n_klist is not equal to zero. ie. we lost the "& KNODE_DEAD".
In the GCC output you can see it:
c0000000008c8a30 <.klist_node_init>:
c0000000008c8a30: 39 24 00 08 addi r9,r4,8
c0000000008c8a34: 39 40 00 01 li r10,1
c0000000008c8a38: f9 24 00 08 std r9,8(r4)
c0000000008c8a3c: f9 24 00 10 std r9,16(r4)
c0000000008c8a40: 91 44 00 18 stw r10,24(r4)
c0000000008c8a44: f8 64 00 00 std r3,0(r4)
c0000000008c8a48: 54 69 07 fe clrlwi r9,r3,31
c0000000008c8a4c: 0b 09 00 00 tdnei r9,0
ie. the clrlwi is "clear left (word) immediate", and zeroes everything
except bit 0, which is equivalent to "& KNODE_DEAD".
So there seems to be some misunderstanding with clang, it doesn't like
us passing an expression to the inline asm.
AFAIK it is legal to pass expressions as inputs to inline asm, ie. it
doesn't have to just be a variable name.
This patch seems to fix it. Not sure if that's just papering over it though.
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h
index 1ee0f22313ee..75fcb4370d96 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ __label_warn_on: \
\
WARN_ENTRY(PPC_TLNEI " %4, 0", \
BUGFLAG_WARNING | BUGFLAG_TAINT(TAINT_WARN), \
- __label_warn_on, "r" (x)); \
+ __label_warn_on, "r" (!!(x))); \
break; \
__label_warn_on: \
__ret_warn_on = true; \
Generates:
c0000000008e2ac0 <.klist_add_tail>:
c0000000008e2ac0: 7c 08 02 a6 mflr r0
c0000000008e2ac4: f8 01 00 10 std r0,16(r1)
c0000000008e2ac8: f8 21 ff 71 stdu r1,-144(r1)
c0000000008e2acc: fb a1 00 78 std r29,120(r1)
c0000000008e2ad0: 7c 7d 1b 78 mr r29,r3
c0000000008e2ad4: 38 60 00 01 li r3,1
c0000000008e2ad8: fb c1 00 80 std r30,128(r1)
c0000000008e2adc: 7c 9e 23 78 mr r30,r4
c0000000008e2ae0: 38 9d 00 18 addi r4,r29,24
c0000000008e2ae4: 57 c5 07 fe clrlwi r5,r30,31 <-
c0000000008e2ae8: fb 81 00 70 std r28,112(r1)
c0000000008e2aec: 3b 9d 00 08 addi r28,r29,8
c0000000008e2af0: fb 9d 00 08 std r28,8(r29)
c0000000008e2af4: fb 9d 00 10 std r28,16(r29)
c0000000008e2af8: 90 64 00 00 stw r3,0(r4)
c0000000008e2afc: fb dd 00 00 std r30,0(r29)
c0000000008e2b00: 0b 05 00 00 tdnei r5,0 <-
cheers
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list