[PATCH v2 09/12] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
Borislav Petkov
bp at alien8.de
Tue Aug 17 20:22:33 AEST 2021
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 11:59:28AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> The mem_encrypt_active() function has been replaced by prot_guest_has(),
> so remove the implementation.
>
> Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky at amd.com>
> ---
> include/linux/mem_encrypt.h | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
> index 5c4a18a91f89..ae4526389261 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
> @@ -16,10 +16,6 @@
>
> #include <asm/mem_encrypt.h>
>
> -#else /* !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */
> -
> -static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void) { return false; }
> -
> #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
> --
This one wants to be part of the previous patch.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list