[PATCH v5 08/11] powerpc/pseries/iommu: Update remove_dma_window() to accept property name

[Leonardo Brás]

Hello Fred, thanks for the feedback!

On Tue, 2021-07-20 at 19:51 +0200, Frederic Barrat wrote:
> 
> 
> On 16/07/2021 10:27, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> > Update remove_dma_window() so it can be used to remove DDW with a
> > given
> > property name.
> > 
> > This enables the creation of new property names for DDW, so we can
> > have different usage for it, like indirect mapping.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras.c at gmail.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik at ozlabs.ru>
> > ---
> >   arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
> >   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
> > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
> > index 108c3dcca686..17c6f4706e76 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
> > @@ -830,31 +830,32 @@ static void remove_dma_window(struct
> > device_node *np, u32 *ddw_avail,
> >                         np, ret, ddw_avail[DDW_REMOVE_PE_DMA_WIN],
> > liobn);
> >   }
> >   
> > -static void remove_ddw(struct device_node *np, bool remove_prop)
> > +static int remove_ddw(struct device_node *np, bool remove_prop,
> > const char *win_name)
> >   {
> 
> 
> Why switch to returning an int? None of the callers check it.

IIRC, in a previous version it did make sense, which is not the case
anymore. I will revert this.

Thanks!

> 
>    Fred