[PATCH] powerpc/kprobes: Fix kprobe Oops happens in booke
Michael Ellerman
mpe at ellerman.id.au
Thu Aug 5 16:13:41 AEST 2021
Pu Lehui <pulehui at huawei.com> writes:
> When using kprobe on powerpc booke series processor, Oops happens
> as show bellow:
>
> [ 35.861352] Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#1]
> [ 35.861676] BE PAGE_SIZE=4K SMP NR_CPUS=24 QEMU e500
> [ 35.861905] Modules linked in:
> [ 35.862144] CPU: 0 PID: 76 Comm: sh Not tainted 5.14.0-rc3-00060-g7e96bf476270 #18
> [ 35.862610] NIP: c0b96470 LR: c00107b4 CTR: c0161c80
> [ 35.862805] REGS: c387fe70 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (5.14.0-rc3-00060-g7e96bf476270)
> [ 35.863198] MSR: 00029002 <CE,EE,ME> CR: 24022824 XER: 20000000
> [ 35.863577]
> [ 35.863577] GPR00: c0015218 c387ff20 c313e300 c387ff50 00000004 40000002 40000000 0a1a2cce
> [ 35.863577] GPR08: 00000000 00000004 00000000 59764000 24022422 102490c2 00000000 00000000
> [ 35.863577] GPR16: 00000000 00000000 00000040 10240000 10240000 10240000 10240000 10220000
> [ 35.863577] GPR24: ffffffff 10240000 00000000 00000000 bfc655e8 00000800 c387ff50 00000000
> [ 35.865367] NIP [c0b96470] schedule+0x0/0x130
> [ 35.865606] LR [c00107b4] interrupt_exit_user_prepare_main+0xf4/0x100
> [ 35.865974] Call Trace:
> [ 35.866142] [c387ff20] [c0053224] irq_exit+0x114/0x120 (unreliable)
> [ 35.866472] [c387ff40] [c0015218] interrupt_return+0x14/0x13c
> [ 35.866728] --- interrupt: 900 at 0x100af3dc
> [ 35.866963] NIP: 100af3dc LR: 100de020 CTR: 00000000
> [ 35.867177] REGS: c387ff50 TRAP: 0900 Not tainted (5.14.0-rc3-00060-g7e96bf476270)
> [ 35.867488] MSR: 0002f902 <CE,EE,PR,FP,ME> CR: 20022422 XER: 20000000
> [ 35.867808]
> [ 35.867808] GPR00: c001509c bfc65570 1024b4d0 00000000 100de020 20022422 bfc655a8 100af3dc
> [ 35.867808] GPR08: 0002f902 00000000 00000000 00000000 72656773 102490c2 00000000 00000000
> [ 35.867808] GPR16: 00000000 00000000 00000040 10240000 10240000 10240000 10240000 10220000
> [ 35.867808] GPR24: ffffffff 10240000 00000000 00000000 bfc655e8 10245910 ffffffff 00000001
> [ 35.869406] NIP [100af3dc] 0x100af3dc
> [ 35.869578] LR [100de020] 0x100de020
> [ 35.869751] --- interrupt: 900
> [ 35.870001] Instruction dump:
> [ 35.870283] 40c20010 815e0518 714a0100 41e2fd04 39200000 913e00c0 3b1e0450 4bfffd80
> [ 35.870666] 0fe00000 92a10024 4bfff1a9 60000000 <7fe00008> 7c0802a6 93e1001c 7c5f1378
> [ 35.871339] ---[ end trace 23ff848139efa9b9 ]---
>
> There is no real mode for booke arch and the MMU translation is
> always on. The corresponding MSR_IS/MSR_DS bit in booke is used
> to switch the address space, but not for real mode judgment.
>
> Fixes: 21f8b2fa3ca5 ("powerpc/kprobes: Ignore traps that happened in real mode")
> Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui at huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 5 +----
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h
> index 3e5d470a6155..4aec1a97024b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h
> @@ -187,6 +187,12 @@ static inline unsigned long frame_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
> #define user_mode(regs) (((regs)->msr & MSR_PR) != 0)
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BOOKE
> +#define real_mode(regs) 0
> +#else
> +#define real_mode(regs) (!((regs)->msr & MSR_IR) || !((regs)->msr & MSR_DR))
> +#endif
I'm not sure about this helper.
Arguably it should only return true if both MSR_IR and MSR_DR are clear.
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
> index cbc28d1a2e1b..fac9a5974718 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -289,10 +289,7 @@ int kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> unsigned int *addr = (unsigned int *)regs->nip;
> struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb;
>
> - if (user_mode(regs))
> - return 0;
> -
> - if (!(regs->msr & MSR_IR) || !(regs->msr & MSR_DR))
> + if (user_mode(regs) || real_mode(regs))
> return 0;
I think just adding an IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOOKE) here might be better.
cheers
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list