mmu.c:undefined reference to `patch__hash_page_A0'

Randy Dunlap rdunlap at infradead.org
Sun Apr 18 10:02:04 AEST 2021


HI--

I no longer see this build error.
However:

On 2/27/21 2:24 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> head:   3fb6d0e00efc958d01c2f109c8453033a2d96796
> commit: 259149cf7c3c6195e6199e045ca988c31d081cab powerpc/32s: Only build hash code when CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_604 is selected
> date:   4 weeks ago
> config: powerpc64-randconfig-r013-20210227 (attached as .config)

ktr/lkp, this is a PPC32 .config file that is attached, not PPC64.

Also:

> compiler: powerpc-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=259149cf7c3c6195e6199e045ca988c31d081cab
>         git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
>         git fetch --no-tags linus master
>         git checkout 259149cf7c3c6195e6199e045ca988c31d081cab
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=powerpc64 
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    powerpc-linux-ld: arch/powerpc/mm/book3s32/mmu.o: in function `MMU_init_hw_patch':
>>> mmu.c:(.init.text+0x75e): undefined reference to `patch__hash_page_A0'
>>> powerpc-linux-ld: mmu.c:(.init.text+0x76a): undefined reference to `patch__hash_page_A0'
>>> powerpc-linux-ld: mmu.c:(.init.text+0x776): undefined reference to `patch__hash_page_A1'
>    powerpc-linux-ld: mmu.c:(.init.text+0x782): undefined reference to `patch__hash_page_A1'
>>> powerpc-linux-ld: mmu.c:(.init.text+0x78e): undefined reference to `patch__hash_page_A2'
>    powerpc-linux-ld: mmu.c:(.init.text+0x79a): undefined reference to `patch__hash_page_A2'
>>> powerpc-linux-ld: mmu.c:(.init.text+0x7aa): undefined reference to `patch__hash_page_B'
>    powerpc-linux-ld: mmu.c:(.init.text+0x7b6): undefined reference to `patch__hash_page_B'
>>> powerpc-linux-ld: mmu.c:(.init.text+0x7c2): undefined reference to `patch__hash_page_C'
>    powerpc-linux-ld: mmu.c:(.init.text+0x7ce): undefined reference to `patch__hash_page_C'
>>> powerpc-linux-ld: mmu.c:(.init.text+0x7da): undefined reference to `patch__flush_hash_A0'
>    powerpc-linux-ld: mmu.c:(.init.text+0x7e6): undefined reference to `patch__flush_hash_A0'
>>> powerpc-linux-ld: mmu.c:(.init.text+0x7f2): undefined reference to `patch__flush_hash_A1'
>    powerpc-linux-ld: mmu.c:(.init.text+0x7fe): undefined reference to `patch__flush_hash_A1'
>>> powerpc-linux-ld: mmu.c:(.init.text+0x80a): undefined reference to `patch__flush_hash_A2'
>    powerpc-linux-ld: mmu.c:(.init.text+0x816): undefined reference to `patch__flush_hash_A2'
>>> powerpc-linux-ld: mmu.c:(.init.text+0x83e): undefined reference to `patch__flush_hash_B'
>    powerpc-linux-ld: mmu.c:(.init.text+0x84e): undefined reference to `patch__flush_hash_B'
>    powerpc-linux-ld: arch/powerpc/mm/book3s32/mmu.o: in function `update_mmu_cache':
>>> mmu.c:(.text.update_mmu_cache+0xa0): undefined reference to `add_hash_page'

I do see this build error:

powerpc-linux-ld: arch/powerpc/boot/wrapper.a(decompress.o): in function `partial_decompress':
decompress.c:(.text+0x1f0): undefined reference to `__decompress'

when either
CONFIG_KERNEL_LZO=y
or
CONFIG_KERNEL_LZMA=y

but the build succeeds when either
CONFIG_KERNEL_GZIP=y
or
CONFIG_KERNEL_XZ=y

I guess that is due to arch/powerpc/boot/decompress.c doing this:

#ifdef CONFIG_KERNEL_GZIP
#	include "decompress_inflate.c"
#endif

#ifdef CONFIG_KERNEL_XZ
#	include "xz_config.h"
#	include "../../../lib/decompress_unxz.c"
#endif


It would be nice to require one of KERNEL_GZIP or KERNEL_XZ
to be set/enabled (maybe unless a uImage is being built?).

ta.
-- 
~Randy



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list