[RFC/PATCH] powerpc/smp: Add SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES flag to MC sched-domain
Mel Gorman
mgorman at techsingularity.net
Mon Apr 12 19:37:22 AEST 2021
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 11:54:36AM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Gautham R. Shenoy <ego at linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2021-04-02 11:07:54]:
>
> >
> > To remedy this, this patch proposes that the LLC be moved to the MC
> > level which is a group of cores in one half of the chip.
> >
> > SMT (SMT4) --> MC (Hemisphere)[LLC] --> DIE
> >
>
> I think marking Hemisphere as a LLC in a P10 scenario is a good idea.
>
> > While there is no cache being shared at this level, this is still the
> > level where some amount of cache-snooping takes place and it is
> > relatively faster to access the data from the caches of the cores
> > within this domain. With this change, we no longer see regressions on
> > P10 for applications which require single threaded performance.
>
> Peter, Valentin, Vincent, Mel, etal
>
> On architectures where we have multiple levels of cache access latencies
> within a DIE, (For example: one within the current LLC or SMT core and the
> other at MC or Hemisphere, and finally across hemispheres), do you have any
> suggestions on how we could handle the same in the core scheduler?
>
Minimally I think it would be worth detecting when there are multiple
LLCs per node and detecting that in generic code as a static branch. In
select_idle_cpu, consider taking two passes -- first on the LLC domain
and if no idle CPU is found then taking a second pass if the search depth
allows within the node with the LLC CPUs masked out. While there would be
a latency hit because cache is not shared, it would still be a CPU local
to memory that is idle. That would potentially be beneficial on Zen*
as well without having to introduce new domains in the topology hierarchy.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list