[PATCH] rpadlpar_io:Add MODULE_DESCRIPTION entries to kernel modules

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 04:41:39PM +1000, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 3:15 PM Mamatha Inamdar
> <mamatha4 at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > This patch adds a brief MODULE_DESCRIPTION to rpadlpar_io kernel modules
> > (descriptions taken from Kconfig file)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mamatha Inamdar <mamatha4 at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/hotplug/rpadlpar_core.c |    1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/rpadlpar_core.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/rpadlpar_core.c
> > index f979b70..bac65ed 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/rpadlpar_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/rpadlpar_core.c
> > @@ -478,3 +478,4 @@ static void __exit rpadlpar_io_exit(void)
> >  module_init(rpadlpar_io_init);
> >  module_exit(rpadlpar_io_exit);
> >  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("RPA Dynamic Logical Partitioning driver for I/O slots");
> 
> RPA as a spec was superseded by PAPR in the early 2000s. Can we rename
> this already?
> 
> The only potential problem I can see is scripts doing: modprobe
> rpadlpar_io or similar
> 
> However, we should be able to fix that with a module alias.

Is MODULE_DESCRIPTION() connected with how modprobe works?

If this patch just improves documentation, without breaking users of
modprobe, I'm fine with it, even if it would be nice to rename to PAPR
or something in the future.

But, please use "git log --oneline drivers/pci/hotplug/rpadlpar*" and
match the style, and also look through the rest of drivers/pci/ to see
if we should do the same thing to any other modules.

Bjorn