[PATCH v3 08/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable/thp: Use page table depost/withdraw with THP
Aneesh Kumar K.V
aneesh.kumar at linux.ibm.com
Tue Sep 1 16:25:30 AEST 2020
On 9/1/20 8:52 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>
> On 08/27/2020 01:34 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Architectures like ppc64 use deposited page table while updating the huge pte
>> entries.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar at linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 10 +++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
>> index f9f6358899a8..0ce5c6a24c5b 100644
>> --- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
>> +++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
>> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static void __init pmd_basic_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
>> static void __init pmd_advanced_tests(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmdp,
>> unsigned long pfn, unsigned long vaddr,
>> - pgprot_t prot)
>> + pgprot_t prot, pgtable_t pgtable)
>> {
>> pmd_t pmd;
>>
>> @@ -165,6 +165,8 @@ static void __init pmd_advanced_tests(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> /* Align the address wrt HPAGE_PMD_SIZE */
>> vaddr = (vaddr & HPAGE_PMD_MASK) + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE;
>>
>> + pgtable_trans_huge_deposit(mm, pmdp, pgtable);
>> +
>> pmd = pmd_mkhuge(pfn_pmd(pfn, prot));
>> set_pmd_at(mm, vaddr, pmdp, pmd);
>> pmdp_set_wrprotect(mm, vaddr, pmdp);
>> @@ -193,6 +195,8 @@ static void __init pmd_advanced_tests(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> pmdp_test_and_clear_young(vma, vaddr, pmdp);
>> pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp);
>> WARN_ON(pmd_young(pmd));
>> +
>> + pgtable = pgtable_trans_huge_withdraw(mm, pmdp);
>
> Should the call sites here be wrapped with __HAVE_ARCH_PGTABLE_DEPOSIT and
> __HAVE_ARCH_PGTABLE_WITHDRAW respectively. Though there are generic fallback
> definitions, wondering whether they are indeed essential for all platforms.
>
No, because Any page table helpers operating on pmd level THP can expect
a deposited page table.
__HAVE_ARCH_PGTABLE_DEPOSIT indicates that fallback to generic version.
>> }
>>
>> static void __init pmd_leaf_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
>> @@ -373,7 +377,7 @@ static void __init pud_basic_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
>> static void __init pmd_advanced_tests(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmdp,
>> unsigned long pfn, unsigned long vaddr,
>> - pgprot_t prot)
>> + pgprot_t prot, pgtable_t pgtable)
>> {
>> }
>> static void __init pud_advanced_tests(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> @@ -1015,7 +1019,7 @@ static int __init debug_vm_pgtable(void)
>> pgd_clear_tests(mm, pgdp);
>>
>> pte_advanced_tests(mm, vma, ptep, pte_aligned, vaddr, prot);
>> - pmd_advanced_tests(mm, vma, pmdp, pmd_aligned, vaddr, prot);
>> + pmd_advanced_tests(mm, vma, pmdp, pmd_aligned, vaddr, prot, saved_ptep);
>> pud_advanced_tests(mm, vma, pudp, pud_aligned, vaddr, prot);
>> hugetlb_advanced_tests(mm, vma, ptep, pte_aligned, vaddr, prot);
>>
>>
>
> There is a checkpatch.pl warning here.
>
> WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
> #7:
> Architectures like ppc64 use deposited page table while updating the huge pte
>
> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 40 lines checked
>
I will ignore all these, because they are not really important IMHO.
-aneesh
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list