[PATCH v6 09/22] powerpc/exec: Set thread.regs early during exec

[Christophe Leroy]

Le 26/11/2020 à 08:38, Aneesh Kumar K.V a écrit :
> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy at csgroup.eu> writes:
> 
>> Le 25/11/2020 à 06:16, Aneesh Kumar K.V a écrit :
> ....
> 
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
>>> @@ -1530,10 +1530,32 @@ void flush_thread(void)
>>>    #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
>>>    void arch_setup_new_exec(void)
>>>    {
>>> -	if (radix_enabled())
>>> -		return;
>>> -	hash__setup_new_exec();
>>> +	if (!radix_enabled())
>>> +		hash__setup_new_exec();
>>> +
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * If we exec out of a kernel thread then thread.regs will not be
>>> +	 * set.  Do it now.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	if (!current->thread.regs) {
>>> +		struct pt_regs *regs = task_stack_page(current) + THREAD_SIZE;
>>> +		current->thread.regs = regs - 1;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +}
>>> +#else
>>> +void arch_setup_new_exec(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * If we exec out of a kernel thread then thread.regs will not be
>>> +	 * set.  Do it now.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	if (!current->thread.regs) {
>>> +		struct pt_regs *regs = task_stack_page(current) + THREAD_SIZE;
>>> +		current->thread.regs = regs - 1;
>>> +	}
>>>    }
>>> +
>>>    #endif
>>
>> No need to duplicate arch_setup_new_exec() I think. radix_enabled() is defined at all time so the
>> first function should be valid at all time.
>>
> 
> arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c: In function ‘arch_setup_new_exec’:
> arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c:1529:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘hash__setup_new_exec’; did you mean ‘arch_setup_new_exec’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   1529 |   hash__setup_new_exec();
>        |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>        |   arch_setup_new_exec
> 
> 
> That requires us to have hash__setup_new_exec prototype for all platforms.

Yes indeed.

So maybe, just enclose that part in the #ifdef instead of duplicating the common part ?

Christophe