[PATCH] powerpc/pseries/hotplug-cpu: Fix memleak when cpus node not exist

[Tyrel Datwyler]

On 11/10/20 6:08 AM, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> Zhang Xiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5 at huawei.com> writes:
>> From: zhangxiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5 at huawei.com>
>>
>> If the cpus nodes not exist, we lost to free the 'cpu_drcs', which
>> will leak memory.
>>
>> Fixes: a0ff72f9f5a7 ("powerpc/pseries/hotplug-cpu: Remove double free in error path")
>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci at huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: zhangxiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5 at huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
>> index f2837e33bf5d..4bb1c9f2bb11 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
>> @@ -743,6 +743,7 @@ static int dlpar_cpu_add_by_count(u32 cpus_to_add)
>>  	parent = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
>>  	if (!parent) {
>>  		pr_warn("Could not find CPU root node in device tree\n");
>> +		kfree(cpu_drcs);
>>  		return -1;
>>  	}
> 
> Thanks for finding this.
> 
> a0ff72f9f5a7 ("powerpc/pseries/hotplug-cpu: Remove double free in error
> path") was posted in Sept 2019 but was not applied until July 2020:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20190919231633.1344-1-nathanl@linux.ibm.com/
> 
> Here is that change as posted; note the function context is
> find_dlpar_cpus_to_add(), not dlpar_cpu_add_by_count():
> 
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
> @@ -726,7 +726,6 @@ static int find_dlpar_cpus_to_add(u32 *cpu_drcs, u32 cpus_to_add)
>  	parent = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
>  	if (!parent) {
>  		pr_warn("Could not find CPU root node in device tree\n");
> -		kfree(cpu_drcs);
>  		return -1;
>  	}
> 
> Meanwhile b015f6bc9547dbc056edde7177c7868ca8629c4c ("powerpc/pseries: Add
> cpu DLPAR support for drc-info property") was posted in Nov 2019 and
> committed a few days later:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/1573449697-5448-4-git-send-email-tyreld@linux.ibm.com/
> 
> This change reorganized the same code, removing
> find_dlpar_cpus_to_add(), and it had the effect of fixing the same
> issue.
> 
> However git apparently allowed the older change to still apply on top of
> this (changing a function different from the one in the original
> patch!), leading to a real bug.

Yikes, not sure how that happened without either the committer massaging the
patch to apply, or the line location and context matching exactly.

> 
> Your patch is correct but it should be framed as a revert of
> a0ff72f9f5a7 with this context in the commit message.
> 

Agreed, in reality we want to revert a patch that shouldn't have been applied.

-Tyrel