[PATCH 10/12] powerpc/entry32: Blacklist exception entry points for kprobe.
Christophe Leroy
christophe.leroy at c-s.fr
Tue Mar 31 05:33:23 AEDT 2020
Le 30/03/2020 à 19:08, Naveen N. Rao a écrit :
> Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> kprobe does not handle events happening in real mode.
>>
>> As exception entry points are running with MMU disabled,
>> blacklist them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy at c-s.fr>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S
>> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S
>> index 94f78c03cb79..9a1a45d6038a 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S
>> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ mcheck_transfer_to_handler:
>> mfspr r0,SPRN_DSRR1
>> stw r0,_DSRR1(r11)
>> /* fall through */
>> +_ASM_NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(mcheck_transfer_to_handler)
>>
>> .globl debug_transfer_to_handler
>> debug_transfer_to_handler:
>> @@ -59,6 +60,7 @@ debug_transfer_to_handler:
>> mfspr r0,SPRN_CSRR1
>> stw r0,_CSRR1(r11)
>> /* fall through */
>> +_ASM_NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(debug_transfer_to_handler)
>>
>> .globl crit_transfer_to_handler
>> crit_transfer_to_handler:
>> @@ -94,6 +96,7 @@ crit_transfer_to_handler:
>> rlwinm r0,r1,0,0,(31 - THREAD_SHIFT)
>> stw r0,KSP_LIMIT(r8)
>> /* fall through */
>> +_ASM_NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(crit_transfer_to_handler)
>> #endif
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_40x
>> @@ -115,6 +118,7 @@ crit_transfer_to_handler:
>> rlwinm r0,r1,0,0,(31 - THREAD_SHIFT)
>> stw r0,KSP_LIMIT(r8)
>> /* fall through */
>> +_ASM_NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(crit_transfer_to_handler)
>> #endif
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -127,6 +131,7 @@ crit_transfer_to_handler:
>> .globl transfer_to_handler_full
>> transfer_to_handler_full:
>> SAVE_NVGPRS(r11)
>> +_ASM_NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(transfer_to_handler_full)
>> /* fall through */
>>
>> .globl transfer_to_handler
>> @@ -286,6 +291,8 @@ reenable_mmu:
>> lwz r2, GPR2(r11)
>> b fast_exception_return
>> #endif
>> +_ASM_NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(transfer_to_handler)
>> +_ASM_NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(transfer_to_handler_cont)
>
> These are added after 'reenable_mmu', which is itself not blacklisted.
> Is that intentional?
Yes I put it as the complete end of the entry part, ie just before
stack_ovf which is a function by itself.
Note that reenable_mmu is inside an #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS.
I'm not completely sure where to put the _ASM_NOKPROBE_SYMBOL()s, that's
the reason why I put it close to the symbol itself in my first series.
Could you have a look at the code and tell me what looks the most
appropriate as a location to you ?
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.6/source/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S#L230
Thanks
Christophe
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list