[PATCH 1/1] ppc/crash: Skip spinlocks during crash

[Leonardo Bras]

Hello Peter, 

On Mon, 2020-03-30 at 13:02 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>  		do {
> > > +			if (unlikely(crash_skip_spinlock))
> > > +				return;
> > 
> > You are adding a test that reads a global var in the middle of a so hot path
> > ? That must kill performance. Can we do different ?
> 
> This; adding code to a super hot patch like this for an exceptional case
> like the crash handling seems like a very very bad trade to me.
> 
> One possible solution is to simply write 0 to the affected spinlocks
> after sending the NMI IPI thing, no?

Yes, I agree.
I suggested this on a comment in v2 of this patch:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1262468/


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20200330/b9d5a201/attachment.sig>