[PATCH v12 8/8] MAINTAINERS: perf: Add pattern that matches ppc perf to the perf entry.
Andy Shevchenko
andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com
Sat Mar 21 03:47:11 AEDT 2020
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 05:42:04PM +0100, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 06:31:57PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 07:42:03AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2020-03-20 at 14:42 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:23:38PM +0100, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:33:50PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 11:20:19AM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > > > > > > While at it also simplify the existing perf patterns.
> > > > > > And still missed fixes from parse-maintainers.pl.
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh, that script UX is truly ingenious.
> > > >
> > > > You have at least two options, their combinations, etc:
> > > > - complain to the author :-)
> > > > - send a patch :-)
> > >
> > > Recently:
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/4d5291fa3fb4962b1fa55e8fd9ef421ef0c1b1e5.camel@perches.com/
> >
> > But why?
> >
> > Shouldn't we rather run MAINTAINERS clean up once and require people to use
> > parse-maintainers.pl for good?
>
> That cleanup did not happen yet, and I am not volunteering for one.
> The difference between MAINTAINERS and MAINTAINERS.new is:
>
> MAINTAINERS | 5510 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 2755 insertions(+), 2755 deletions(-)
Yes, it was basically reply to Joe.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list